New Showbiz

You are here:
The Profession of Arms

The Profession of Arms

2001

Director

Ermanno Olmi

Runtime

105 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

In autumn of 1526, the Emperor, Charles V, sends his German landsknechts led by Georg von Frundsberg to march towards Rome. The inferior papal armies, commanded by Giovanni de'Medici, try to chase them in the midst of a harsh winter. Nevertheless, the Imperial armies manage to cross the rivers along their march and get cannons thanks to the maneuvers of its Lords. In a skirmish, Giovanni de'Medici is wounded in the leg by a falconet shot. The attempts to cure him fail and he dies. The Imperial armies assault Rome. The film is beautifully but unassumingly set, and shows the hard conditions in which war is waged and its lack of glory. It ends straightforwardly with the declaration made after the death of Giovanni de'Medici by the commanders of the armies in Europe of not using again fire weapons because of their cruelty.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.7/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film focuses on the rigid, patriarchal structures of 16th-century military life. There are no discernible narratives addressing queer themes or non-cisnormative identities.

Gender Representation

Limited

Agency is concentrated almost exclusively in male commanders and soldiers. The film highlights grim, male-dominated violence rather than subverting traditional gender roles or presenting female agency.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The cast reflects 16th-century European power dynamics, focusing on German and Italian forces. It lacks intersectional breadth, functioning as a study of European internal conflict.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The film subverts Western institutional ideals by presenting a skeptical view of empire and religious leadership. It portrays the machinery of war as inherently destructive and devoid of moral triumph.

Disability Representation

Fair

Physical trauma is depicted through the wounding of Giovanni de' Medici. This emphasizes the era's medical limitations rather than providing agency to a character with a disability.

Strengths

  • Subverts traditional Western ideals of imperial and religious glory.
  • Provides a powerful critique of the dehumanizing nature of military technology.
  • Offers a realistic, unglamorous depiction of historical medical limitations.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks representation of non-cisnormative identities or queer themes.
  • Provides almost no agency or presence for female characters.
  • Maintains a narrow focus on European ethnicities without intersectional breadth.

AI Analysis

The film prioritizes historical realism and a critique of systemic violence over demographic diversity. It adheres strictly to the social hierarchies of the 16th century, which limits the representation of various identities. While it lacks breadth in gender and LGBTQ+ categories, it excels in cultural subversion. It deconstructs the 'glory' of war, focusing instead on the dehumanizing effects of new military technologies. Ultimately, the work is a study of European conflict that uses historical accuracy to highlight the cruelty of power rather than to showcase a diverse global tapestry.

How are these scores produced? →

Similar Movies

Movie poster for Heaven and Earth

Heaven and Earth

1990

No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.0 out of 10
Movie poster for Field of Honor

Field of Honor

1987

No user ratings available yet
No diversity score available

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.