You are here:
At Play in the Fields of the Lord

At Play in the Fields of the Lord

1991

R

Director

Héctor Babenco

Runtime

189 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Martin and Hazel Quarrier are small-town fundamentalist missionaries sent to the jungles of South America to convert the Indians. Their remote mission was previously run by the Catholics, before the natives murdered them all. They are sent by the pompous Leslie Huben, who runs the missionary effort in the area but who seems more concerned about competing with his Catholic 'rivals' than in the Indians themselves. Hazel is terrified of the Indians while Martin is fascinated. Soon American pilot Lewis Moon joins the Indian tribe but is attracted by Leslie's young wife, Andy. Can the interaction of these characters and cultures, and the advancing bulldozers of civilization, avoid disaster?

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

6.4/10

Good


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film lacks LGBTQ+ characters or non-heteronormative identities. Interpersonal dynamics focus on traditional romantic and sexual tensions between missionaries and the local population.

Gender Representation

Fair

Female characters like Hazel demonstrate agency through their emotional responses to the environment. The film avoids celebrating traditional masculinity, instead presenting it as a source of instability.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Excellent

The narrative excels by centering indigenous Amazonian populations and their autonomy. Using indigenous actors provides an authentic presence amidst the clash with Western expansionism.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The film offers a sophisticated critique of Western religious institutions as disruptive forces. It questions the validity of Western doctrines against the lived reality of Amazonian tribes.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There are no significant or central depictions of visible or invisible disabilities within the film.

Strengths

  • Authentic portrayal of indigenous Amazonian populations using indigenous actors.
  • Sophisticated critique of Western religious and colonialist institutions.
  • Prioritizes the agency and survival of indigenous social structures.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lack of LGBTQ+ characters or non-heteronormative identities.
  • Absence of visible or invisible disability representation.
  • Reliance on traditional heteronormative romantic dynamics.

AI Analysis

Héctor Babenco’s drama serves as a rigorous deconstruction of Western hegemony and colonialist frameworks. The film’s primary strength is its refusal to frame missionary work as benevolent, instead portraying it as a destabilizing force. By prioritizing the perspective of indigenous tribes, the narrative challenges the perceived superiority of Western social structures. However, the film remains limited by its adherence to conventional heteronormative structures and a lack of representation for LGBTQ+ and disabled characters. While it successfully critiques institutional imposition, these omissions prevent a more comprehensive diversity profile. Ultimately, the work stands as a notable piece of post-colonial cinema. It succeeds by framing the 'civilizing mission' as an invasive threat to the natural and cultural autonomy of the Amazonian region.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.