You are here:

Mute Fire

Name: Mute Fire
Director: Federico Atehortúa Arteaga
Released: 2019
Duration: 83 min

Representation Score

6.4/10

Good

2019

Director

Federico Atehortúa Arteaga

Runtime

83 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Mute Fire serves as a meta-cinematic investigation into how moving images shape Colombian history. It examines the tension between state propaganda and the lived realities of those caught in systemic violence. The film excels by centering the South American experience and challenging the monolithic narratives often pushed by state institutions. By focusing on the 'false positives' phenomenon, it gives voice to the disenfranchised. While the film offers a strong critique of patriarchal and institutional power, it lacks explicit representation of queer identities or disability. Its impact is primarily found in its deconstruction of nationalistic myths.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Mute Fire have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film looks at non-traditional historical perspectives that might challenge the assumption that everyone is straight or cisgender. However, it doesn't show any specific queer identities or romantic relationships.

How does Mute Fire portray gender?

Fair

The story criticizes patriarchal structures by focusing on the victims of state violence. This shifts the focus away from traditional masculine leadership and toward those who are underrepresented by the military.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Mute Fire?

Excellent

The work centers the South American experience and the socio-political struggles in Colombia. It avoids Western-centric models by focusing on local systemic issues and the plight of murdered youths.

How does Mute Fire represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film deconstructs official patriotism and state-sanctioned truths. It portrays Western-aligned institutions like the military as entities capable of spreading misinformation and oppression.

Does Mute Fire include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no specific evidence regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities within the film.

Present on Screen

Strong emphasis on South American experiences and local socio-political history.
Effective critique of state-sanctioned narratives and institutional disinformation.
Prioritizes the perspectives of underrepresented victims over traditional historical figures.

Limited or Absent

Lack of explicit representation of LGBTQ+ identities or romantic arcs.
No visible evidence of characters with physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

Official Synopsis

On 6 March 1906, four men were executed for the attempted murder of Colombian president Rafael Reyes. The event was photographed, and the photos were later used for a fictionalised film on the failed coup. From then on, cinema in this South American country has been inextricably linked to its violent history. Moving images have been used for historiography, propaganda, disinformation and to instil unity in a nation that refuses to come together. Falsos positivos, murdered youths disguised as guerrillas by the army to simulate military success, are a common element.

How are these scores produced? →