
Little Buddha
1993

1987
PG-13Director
Bernardo Bertolucci
Runtime
163 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
A dramatic history of Pu Yi, the last of the Emperors of China, from his lofty birth and brief reign in the Forbidden City, the object of worship by half a billion people; through his abdication, his decline and dissolute lifestyle; his exploitation by the invading Japanese, and finally to his obscure existence as just another peasant worker in the People's Republic.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film adheres to the traditional social frameworks of the Qing Dynasty and subsequent political eras. There is no discernible depiction of non-cisnormative identities or same-sex intimacy.
Gender Representation
The narrative reflects patriarchal imperial hierarchies, providing a nuanced look at concubines within the Forbidden City. However, these women operate within highly restrictive domestic roles that do not subvert gender hierarchies.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The production avoids common Western period epic pitfalls by utilizing a predominantly Chinese cast. It offers a deeply non-Anglo-centric perspective on Chinese sovereignty and the impact of colonial occupation.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film explores the collapse of the 'Mandate of Heaven' and the transition to a socialist state. It examines the tension between individual agency and the rise of collectivist state authority.
Disability Representation
The story touches upon the protagonist's psychological fragility and the mental toll of political upheaval. These elements serve as character studies rather than intentional representations of neurodivergence or physical disability.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Bernardo Bertolucci’s epic succeeds as a significant piece of post-colonial cinema by disrupting Western-centric historical storytelling. Its primary strength is the authentic casting and the complex exploration of Chinese sovereignty and the shift from imperialism to socialism. However, the film remains tethered to the rigid social structures of its era. It lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities and maintains a traditional patriarchal view of gender, documenting rather than subverting the limitations placed upon women. Ultimately, the film's value lies in its deconstruction of monarchical power and its unflinching look at systemic historical shifts, providing a non-Western perspective on the 20th century.

1993

2013

2013

1997

1982

1999

2016

2013

2016

2017

1959

2011
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.