You are here:

The Great Flirtation

The Great Flirtation

Representation Score

1.1/10

Minimal

1934

Approved

Director

Ralph Murphy

Runtime

74 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

The film functions as a standard period drama centered on individual psychological conflict. It prioritizes domestic tension and professional jealousy over systemic social critique or identity-based storytelling. Due to the historical context of 1934, the production likely adheres to strict social norms. The narrative structure appears built around traditional interpersonal conflicts rather than progressive representation. Overall, the film lacks multi-layered elements, reflecting the limited narrative scope and historical constraints of early studio-era cinema.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does The Great Flirtation have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not include any characters with LGBTQ+ identities or same-sex relationships, reinforcing the assumption that everyone is straight or cisgender. The story likely upholds traditional heterosexual family structures.

How does The Great Flirtation portray gender?

Limited

The plot centers on a wife's career success, which may challenge traditional gender roles by giving her professional ability to act. However, it is unclear whether the story ultimately restores traditional gender dynamics.

How racially and ethnically diverse is The Great Flirtation?

Minimal

The film does not feature any multi-layered casting or disruption of racial hierarchies. It likely includes the homogeneous, Anglo-centric casts typical of this genre and period.

How does The Great Flirtation represent religion and culture?

Limited

The story follows conventional Western dramatic clichés, focusing on individual jealousy and marital stability rather than critiquing Western institutions or religious morality.

Does The Great Flirtation include disability representation?

Minimal

No characters with visible or invisible disabilities are included in the narrative.

Present on Screen

  • The premise offers a potential challenge to traditional gender roles by centering on a woman's professional success and public visibility.

Limited or Absent

  • The film lacks racial and ethnic diversity, likely adhering to the homogeneous casting standards of the 1930s.
  • There is no evidence of LGBTQ+ representation or non-straight-centered identities.
  • The narrative fails to address disability or provide perspectives that reflect multiple aspects of identity.

Official Synopsis

Egotistical Budapest stage actor Stephan Karpath (Adolphe Menjou) has his lover and co-star Zita Marishka (Elissa Landi) fired out of jealousy. They marry on a ship to New York City after she decides to leave. In America, Stephan struggles to find work while Zita disguises herself as a famous unmarried Russian actress to land a leading Broadway role, eventually securing a part for Stephan opposite her. As Zita draws romantic attention from the producer and playwright Larry Kenyon (David Manners), Stephan eventually steps aside, feigning a return to Budapest.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.