You are here:
One Is Business, the Other Crime

One Is Business, the Other Crime

1912

NR

Director

D.W. Griffith

Runtime

15 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Griffith intercuts between the lives of two couples married on the same day. One couple is rich, the other poor. Time passes, and in desperation over joblessness, the poor husband attempts to burgle a home, only to be captured at gunpoint by the mistress of the house. It is the home of the rich couple. While holding the poor intruder at gunpoint, the rich wife accidentally discovers evidence implicating her own husband in a bribery scheme.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

3.3/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film focuses exclusively on the parallel lives of two heterosexual married couples. There is no evidence of non-cisnormative identities or same-sex intimacy.

Gender Representation

Fair

The rich wife displays unexpected power by wielding a firearm and uncovering corruption. However, her agency remains reactionary, and the plot relies on traditional male-driven desperation.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

The narrative centers on the class divide between two white, Western families. There is no indication of racial or ethnic diversity in the character arcs.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The film offers a nascent critique of capitalism by framing the wealthy husband as a participant in a bribery scheme. It uses class conflict to drive its melodrama.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no evidence regarding the portrayal of physical or mental disabilities within the film's narrative.

Strengths

  • The narrative provides a critique of capitalist structures by exposing corruption within the wealthy class.
  • The film introduces systemic elements by linking the poor husband's criminal actions to economic necessity and joblessness.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks racial and ethnic diversity, focusing instead on a homogeneous socioeconomic study.
  • Gender roles largely mirror era-specific expectations, with female agency being primarily reactionary.
  • There is a complete absence of LGBTQ+ representation or non-cisnormative identities.

AI Analysis

The film functions as a socioeconomic study of class disparity rather than a vehicle for intersectional representation. While it disrupts upper-class stability by exposing systemic corruption, it remains rooted in the social hierarchies of the early 20th century. Its narrative architecture relies heavily on traditional gendered archetypes and homogeneous casting. The lack of marginalized identities or diverse perspectives keeps the overall score low. Ultimately, the work uses class conflict as a dramatic tool for moralistic storytelling rather than a means to subvert systemic social structures.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.