You are here:

A Game with Stones

A Game with Stones

Representation Score

7.5/10

Good

1965

Director

Jan Švankmajer

Runtime

8 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Jan Švankmajer’s work uses abstract symbols instead of character-driven social dynamics. By focusing on clocks and pendulums, the film sidesteps the complexities of human identity politics. The film's strength lies in its critique of order and causality. It avoids traditional social hierarchies by highlighting the unsettling relationship between objects and ability to act. Since the subjects are not human, the film remains neutral about most social categories. It achieves a subversive quality through its rejection of conventional storytelling and established institutional norms.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does A Game with Stones have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film doesn't show any characters with specific gender identities or sexual orientations. Since the story revolves around objects, there are no interpersonal dynamics to examine.

How does A Game with Stones portray gender?

Fair

With no human characters, the film doesn't reinforce traditional gender roles. It avoids typical male or female stereotypes by focusing on the actions of objects.

How racially and ethnically diverse is A Game with Stones?

Fair

The story focuses on mechanical systems rather than human actors, avoiding ethnic representations and maintaining a neutral stance within its surreal setting.

How does A Game with Stones represent religion and culture?

Good

The work rejects traditional Western storytelling in favor of a cyclical, mechanical logic. It avoids religious or patriotic symbols by using a secular, surreal framework.

Does A Game with Stones include disability representation?

Fair

There are no human characters to depict physical or mental disabilities. However, the film's focus on objects challenges usual views on functionality and ability to act.

Present on Screen

  • Rejects traditional Western narrative structures in favor of avant-garde abstraction.
  • Avoids reinforcing traditional gender roles or patriarchal leadership through non-human subjects.
  • Provides a systemic critique of order and causality through surrealist mechanical processes.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks human representation due to its focus on inanimate objects.
  • Does not provide explicit depictions of gender identity, sexual orientation, or ethnic diversity.

Official Synopsis

A device consisting of a clock, a pendulum, a faucet and a bucket enacts a series of events whenever the clock chimes.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.