You are here:
The Hawaiians

The Hawaiians

1970

PG

Director

Tom Gries

Runtime

134 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

A wanderer returns home only to find political turmoil, disease and romantic difficulties.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

5.1/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. The social landscape remains strictly rooted in the traditional romantic and familial structures of the 19th century.

Gender Representation

Fair

Female characters navigate shifting political tides but operate within the constraints of period-specific social expectations. The film lacks significant subversion of traditional masculine leadership or gendered power dynamics.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Good

The production centers the Native Hawaiian experience amidst Western settlement. By utilizing both indigenous and Western performers, it avoids a purely Anglo-centric perspective and highlights ethnic tensions.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The narrative offers a sophisticated critique of Western institutional expansion. It portrays missionary structures and capitalist land acquisition as disruptive forces that catalyze cultural displacement and systemic upheaval.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no discernible focus on physical, neurodivergent, or sensory disabilities within the primary character arcs or the central plot progression.

Strengths

  • Strong emphasis on Native Hawaiian agency and the indigenous experience.
  • Sophisticated critique of Western missionary influence and capitalist expansion.
  • Avoids a purely Anglo-centric lens by utilizing a diverse cast.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lack of representation for LGBTQ+ identities and non-heteronormative narratives.
  • Adherence to traditional gender hierarchies and masculine leadership roles.
  • Absence of characters or storylines addressing physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

AI Analysis

The Hawaiians functions as a compelling historical drama that prioritizes a post-colonial perspective. It successfully centers the Native Hawaiian experience, using the collision of Polynesian social orders and Western expansionism to drive its narrative tension. While the film excels in ethnic and cultural representation, it remains conservative in its depiction of social identities. The narrative adheres to established 19th-century hierarchies regarding gender and lacks any presence of LGBTQ+ or disability-focused storylines. Ultimately, the film is a study of cultural friction. It succeeds in portraying the agency of indigenous populations facing colonization, even as it maintains traditional views on gender and sexual identity.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.