You are here:

Hawaii

Hawaii

Representation Score

3.0/10

Limited

1966

Approved

Director

George Roy Hill

Runtime

189 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

George Roy Hill’s epic stands out as a nuanced examination of cultural conflict rather than a typical adventure film. Its strongest point is its post-colonial perspective, which treats the Hawaiian monarchy and its customs with respect and complexity. This avoids the common pitfall of historical epics that reduce indigenous cultures to mere backdrops for Western heroism. However, the film remains tied to traditional gender dynamics. The narrative emphasizes colonial exploration and missionary work, focusing on male-dominated spheres and leaving female characters confined by the patriarchal structures of the time. Overall, the film offers a sophisticated critique of imperialism. Despite lacking LGBTQ+ or disability representation, it effectively highlights the systemic impact of cultural collision, providing a depth rarely seen in 1960s historical cinema.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Hawaii have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not include any LGBTQ+ characters or stories. The social structures shown are traditionally focused on straight relationships.

How does Hawaii portray gender?

Limited

The story focuses on male-dominated areas of colonial exploration and tribal leadership. Female characters play important roles but are limited by the patriarchal structures of their time.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Hawaii?

Good

The film portrays Native Hawaiians as a complex society with intricate social structures. It avoids oversimplified stereotypes by giving indigenous characters significant depth and importance.

How does Hawaii represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film questions the idea of Western civilization by showing religious imposition as a destabilizing force. It respects Hawaiian spiritual traditions as legitimate and sophisticated.

Does Hawaii include disability representation?

Minimal

There is not enough information in the film to evaluate the depiction of physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

Present on Screen

  • Offers a sophisticated, non-stereotypical portrayal of Native Hawaiian society and its complex social hierarchies.
  • Critiques Western imperialism by presenting missionary expansion as a source of systemic instability and tragedy.
  • Avoids oversimplified 'noble savage' stereotypes by giving indigenous characters significant depth and importance.

Limited or Absent

  • The narrative heavily centers on male-dominated colonial and tribal leadership spheres.
  • Female characters are limited by the patriarchal hierarchies of the 18th-century setting.
  • There is a complete absence of LGBTQ+ representation or narratives.

Official Synopsis

Abner Hale, a rigid and humorless New England missionary, marries the beautiful Jerusha Bromley and takes her to the exotic island kingdom of Hawaii, intent on converting the natives. But the clash between the two cultures is too great and instead of understanding there comes tragedy.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.