
Com Licença, Eu Vou à Luta
1985

2013
Director
Moacyr Góes
Runtime
90 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Edgard works as a subordinate in the company of millionaire Werneck and is in love with Ritinha, a simple woman who works as a teacher to support her mother and her three sisters. One day, Peixoto, Werneck's son-in-law, makes him a proposal to marry Maria, the boss's daughter. The reason is that Maria was abused and now is being forced to marry by her family. Edgard hesitates first but accepts the offer. From then on he enters into a great doubt: should he deposit the check and marry Maria or stay with Ritinha, his great love?
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks LGBTQ+ characters or narratives addressing non-cisnormative identities. The central romantic conflict remains strictly within a traditional heterosexual framework.
Gender Representation
The story offers a nuanced look at female agency. Maria’s struggle with patriarchal family structures and Ritinha’s role as a primary provider subvert common passive female tropes.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
While specific racial identities are not explicitly detailed, the plot centers on Brazilian class stratification. This social hierarchy is deeply intertwined with the country's racial and ethnic dynamics.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film critiques traditional institutions and moral relativism. It explores how capitalist hierarchies and family structures can act as sites of oppression rather than support.
Disability Representation
There is no evidence of characters representing physical, neurodivergent, or mental health disabilities within the narrative.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Moacyr Góes utilizes class friction to drive a sophisticated social drama. The film avoids simplistic moral binaries, focusing instead on how systemic pressures influence individual ethics and agency. The narrative succeeds in challenging social hierarchies by highlighting the corruptive influence of wealth. It specifically examines how patriarchal structures and capitalist interests can compromise the autonomy of women and the working class. However, the film lacks representation in several key areas. There is no visible engagement with LGBTQ+ identities or disability representation, leaving the diversity profile focused almost entirely on gender and class.

1985

1992

1975

1965

1949

1976

2009

1976

2012

1963

1979

1996
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.