You are here:
Cute, But Ordinary

Cute, But Ordinary

2013

Director

Moacyr Góes

Runtime

90 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Edgard works as a subordinate in the company of millionaire Werneck and is in love with Ritinha, a simple woman who works as a teacher to support her mother and her three sisters. One day, Peixoto, Werneck's son-in-law, makes him a proposal to marry Maria, the boss's daughter. The reason is that Maria was abused and now is being forced to marry by her family. Edgard hesitates first but accepts the offer. From then on he enters into a great doubt: should he deposit the check and marry Maria or stay with Ritinha, his great love?

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.6/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks LGBTQ+ characters or narratives addressing non-cisnormative identities. The central romantic conflict remains strictly within a traditional heterosexual framework.

Gender Representation

Fair

The story offers a nuanced look at female agency. Maria’s struggle with patriarchal family structures and Ritinha’s role as a primary provider subvert common passive female tropes.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

While specific racial identities are not explicitly detailed, the plot centers on Brazilian class stratification. This social hierarchy is deeply intertwined with the country's racial and ethnic dynamics.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The film critiques traditional institutions and moral relativism. It explores how capitalist hierarchies and family structures can act as sites of oppression rather than support.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no evidence of characters representing physical, neurodivergent, or mental health disabilities within the narrative.

Strengths

  • Subverts passive female tropes by giving Ritinha domestic agency and responsibility.
  • Critiques patriarchal family structures through Maria's struggle for autonomy.
  • Explores complex situational ethics and the corruptive influence of wealth.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks any representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative narratives.
  • Provides no visibility for characters with physical or mental disabilities.
  • Racial identities are not explicitly detailed within the narrative framework.

AI Analysis

Moacyr Góes utilizes class friction to drive a sophisticated social drama. The film avoids simplistic moral binaries, focusing instead on how systemic pressures influence individual ethics and agency. The narrative succeeds in challenging social hierarchies by highlighting the corruptive influence of wealth. It specifically examines how patriarchal structures and capitalist interests can compromise the autonomy of women and the working class. However, the film lacks representation in several key areas. There is no visible engagement with LGBTQ+ identities or disability representation, leaving the diversity profile focused almost entirely on gender and class.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.