You are here:
What a Woman!

What a Woman!

1956

Director

Alessandro Blasetti

Runtime

100 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

A photographer named Corrado snaps a picture of Antonietta. When it shows up on the front page of a magazine, she wants to take him to court over it.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

3.0/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks any evidence of non-heteronormative identities or same-sex intimacy. The narrative focus remains on a conventional interpersonal conflict.

Gender Representation

Fair

Antonietta serves as the primary driver of the plot by seeking legal recourse against a male professional. This shifts agency away from the male photographer and challenges the trope of the passive female subject.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The film reflects the demographic homogeneity typical of 1956 Italy. There is no evidence of intersectional casting or diverse ethnic identities used to disrupt social norms.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The story explores the tension between individual privacy and the power of mass media. It offers a subtle critique of how institutions commodify individuals through photography.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no information regarding the depiction of physical or neurodivergent characters in this work.

Strengths

  • The female lead asserts significant agency by challenging a male professional through legal systems.
  • The narrative subverts traditional gender hierarchies by making the woman the primary driver of the conflict.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-heteronormative themes.
  • There is a notable absence of racial, ethnic, or intersectional diversity in the casting.
  • The work provides no visible representation of characters with disabilities.

AI Analysis

What a Woman! is a mid-century Italian comedy that finds its strength in character agency rather than broad social representation. The film's primary progressive element is its subversion of the male gaze, as the female protagonist moves from being a mere photographic subject to an active legal agent. However, the film remains a product of its era, characterized by significant demographic homogeneity. It lacks intentionality regarding queer themes, racial diversity, or disability representation, functioning mostly within a traditional social framework. Ultimately, the film's value lies in its focus on individual autonomy against institutional media power, even if it lacks modern intersectional markers.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.