The Yes Man
1991
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.3 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
The Unfaithfuls
1953
Director
Steno, Mario Monicelli
Runtime
95 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
A group of "respectable" people are all partly responsible for the suicide of a servant girl. They are pounced upon by a wily blackmailer, who knows that these people will pay dearly rather than inform on themselves or others.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
3.1/10
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks any evidence of non-heteronormative identities. The narrative focus remains strictly on the social dynamics of the respectable class.
Gender Representation
A female servant's tragedy drives the plot, yet the story centers on class power dynamics. The portrayal of the respectable characters undermines traditional masculine archetypes of integrity.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The synopsis does not indicate a diverse cast. The narrative prioritizes class-based distinctions over racial ones, reflecting the era's typical cinematic focus.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film offers a sharp critique of bourgeois social institutions. It uses a blackmailer to dismantle the facades of established social and capitalist hierarchies.
Disability Representation
There is no information regarding the depiction of physical or neurodivergent disabilities within the film.
Strengths
- Strong cultural critique that deconstructs the hypocrisy of the middle class.
- Effective use of satire to challenge established social hierarchies and institutions.
Areas for Improvement
- Minimal representation of LGBTQ+, racial, or disability-related identities.
- Lack of diverse character arcs beyond the central class-based conflict.
AI Analysis
The Unfaithfuls serves as a biting social critique of class hypocrisy rather than a showcase for demographic diversity. It succeeds by deconstructing the moral authority of the bourgeoisie, using satire to expose systemic negligence. While the film lacks representation for LGBTQ+ identities, racial diversity, or disability, it finds strength in its cultural subversion. It challenges the concept of social respectability, framing it as a veneer for cowardice. Ultimately, the film's value lies in its narrative disruption of traditional hierarchies. It prioritizes a critique of institutional morality over explicit identity-based representation.
Similar Movies
A Dog’s Life
1950
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.3 out of 10
The Boarder
1954
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.5 out of 10
All for the Moral Majority!
1984
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.7 out of 10
A Day in Court
1954
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.4 out of 10
The Virtuous Bigamist
1956
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.9 out of 10
Here Come The Freeloaders
1953
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.4 out of 10
Where Is Freedom?
1954
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.7 out of 10
The Rules of the Game
1975
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 6.0 out of 10
Murderers and Thieves
1956
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.5 out of 10
César
1936
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.9 out of 10
Woman Times Seven
1967
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.3 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.