You are here:

Them Thar Hills

Them Thar Hills

Representation Score

0.5/10

Minimal

1934

NR

Director

Charley Rogers

Runtime

20 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Them Thar Hills is a standard 1930s slapstick comedy centered on accidental intoxication. The plot relies on situational absurdity and physical humor rather than social commentary. The film reinforces the era's conventional social and gendered structures. It lacks the narrative complexity or intentionality needed to engage with systemic power dynamics or identity-driven subversion. Ultimately, the work functions as a traditional comedy of errors. It provides no meaningful representation of underrepresented identities or diverse cultural perspectives.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Them Thar Hills have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film adheres to the social norms of 1934 and does not include any non-cisgender identities or narratives that challenge the assumption that everyone is straight or cisgender.

How does Them Thar Hills portray gender?

Limited

The female character plays a secondary, reactive role. Her lack of control over her own story is evident when she is left by her husband to interact with the protagonists.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Them Thar Hills?

Minimal

The setting and plot involving moonshiners provide no indication of a diverse cast. The film appears to reflect the homogeneous casting standards of early Hollywood.

How does Them Thar Hills represent religion and culture?

Limited

The narrative focuses on localized, rural American social interactions. It lacks any critique of Western institutions or the deconstruction of societal norms.

Does Them Thar Hills include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no mention of characters possessing visible or invisible disabilities within the narrative.

Present on Screen

  • The film offers a clear example of the slapstick comedy traditions and situational humor prevalent in the early sound era.

Limited or Absent

  • The film has little control over what happens to them for female characters, relying on traditional gender clichés.
  • The narrative fails to include diverse racial or ethnic perspectives, reflecting a homogeneous cast.
  • There is no representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-straight narratives.

Official Synopsis

Stan and Ollie travel to the mountains for Ollie's health, and park their caravan near a well into which a gang of moonshiners have earlier dumped their moonshine; and the boys proceed to quench their thirst thinking that it is iron-rich mountain water. The real trouble doesn't begin, though, until a married motoring couple stop by to borrow some gasoline, and the already-cranky husband leaves his thirsty wife with the boys while he goes off to refill his car's empty gas-tank. A sequel was made to this film: TIT FOR TAT, q.v.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.