Born Rich
2003
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 3.8 out of 10
You are here:
Generation Wealth
Representation Score
7.7/10
Good
2018
RDirector
Lauren Greenfield
Runtime
110 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetNew Showbiz Analysis
Generation Wealth serves mainly as a sociological critique of hyper-capitalism, focusing less on demographic diversity. Its strength lies in its cultural analysis, revealing the psychological impacts of extreme wealth and status-seeking. The film effectively challenges Western success metrics by highlighting the disconnect between material wealth and social well-being. However, it misses opportunities to deeply explore how race, disability, or LGBTQ+ identities intersect with consumerism. The focus remains on class disparity and the performance of wealth. Ultimately, the film offers a sophisticated look at socioeconomic structures, prioritizing the study of greed and image over the representation of underrepresented groups.
Category Breakdown
Does Generation Wealth have LGBTQ+ representation?
The film does not feature specific depictions of same-sex relationships or non-binary gender identities. LGBTQ+ themes are mentioned incidentally in discussions about wealth.
How does Generation Wealth portray gender?
The documentary explores how women deal with the pressure to achieve aesthetic perfection. It shows how gendered beauty standards are used to promote social status.
How racially and ethnically diverse is Generation Wealth?
The film focuses more on economic disparities than on racial diversity. Though it includes global subjects, the emphasis is on the gap between rich and poor rather than on racial identity.
How does Generation Wealth represent religion and culture?
The film critically examines late-stage capitalism and the distorted version of the American Dream. It critiques Western cultures' obsession with material wealth and status.
Does Generation Wealth include disability representation?
The film does not center on neurodivergence or physical disabilities. It addresses the psychological impacts of wealth-driven culture but does not specifically highlight disability.
Present on Screen
- Critiques late-stage capitalism and the distorted American Dream
- Explores how gendered beauty standards are used to promote social status
- Deconstructs the psychological impacts of extreme wealth and status-seeking
Limited or Absent
- Does not provide specific narratives or representations of LGBTQ+ identities
- Focuses more on socioeconomic class than on racial and ethnic diversity
- Does not offer agentic portrayals of neurodivergence or physical disabilities
Official Synopsis
Over the past 25 years, Lauren Greenfield's documentary photography and film projects have explored youth culture, gender, body image, and affluence. Underscoring the ever-increasing gap between the haves and the have-nots, portraits reveal a focus on cultivating image over substance, where subjects unable to attain actual wealth instead settle for its trappings, no matter their ability to pay for it.
Where to Watch
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select or search, Escape to close.
Similar Movies
Feminists: What Were They Thinking?
2018
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 9.7 out of 10
The One Percent
2006
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 7.9 out of 10
All the Beauty and the Bloodshed
2022
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 9.7 out of 10
Class Divide
2016
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 8.5 out of 10
The Gleaners and I
2000
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 8.9 out of 10
Park Avenue: Money, Power & The American Dream
2012
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 4.8 out of 10
Good Hair
2009
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 9.3 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.