You are here:
Coney Island

Coney Island

1917

NR

Director

Roscoe Arbuckle

Runtime

25 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Arbuckle escapes the watch of his domineering wife and heads for Coney Island. Keaton arrives that same day with his attractive, and rather easy, girlfriend, who is immediately stolen from him by St. John.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

1.3/10

Minimal


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film centers on heterosexual romantic competition. There is no evidence of non-heteronormative identities or same-sex intimacy within the narrative.

Gender Representation

Limited

Gender roles rely on traditional silent-era tropes. The story features a domineering wife and treats the female lead as an attractive prize to be won.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

The production appears homogeneous, with no indication of a diverse cast or non-Anglo-Saxon characters. It reflects the mainstream output typical of 1917.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Limited

The plot follows standard comedic structures of pursuit and conflict. It lacks any critique of traditional institutions or complex cultural perspectives.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no documented evidence regarding the portrayal of physical disabilities or neurodivergence in this work.

Strengths

  • The film serves as a foundational example of early cinematic slapstick comedy.

Areas for Improvement

  • The narrative relies on regressive gender tropes, such as the 'shrewish' wife.
  • The film lacks racial and ethnic diversity in its casting and characterization.
  • Female characters are primarily defined by their aesthetic appeal and romantic utility.

AI Analysis

Coney Island is a period-typical comedy that prioritizes physical slapstick over social complexity. The narrative relies heavily on established early 20th-century archetypes, particularly regarding gender and romance. The film lacks any visible representation of racial or ethnic diversity, functioning within a very narrow cultural framework. It adheres strictly to the social hierarchies of its era rather than challenging them. While historically significant for the genre, the work offers little in the way of progressive representation or intersectional depth, focusing instead on conventional comedic tropes.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.