The Bad Kids
2016
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 4.4 out of 10
You are here:
Paper Tigers
Representation Score
7.7/10
Good
2015
PG-13Director
James Redford
Runtime
102 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetNew Showbiz Analysis
Paper Tigers succeeds as a sociological study of institutional reform, authentically portraying diverse identities within underrepresented socioeconomic contexts. Its greatest strength lies in highlighting the ability to act of its subjects against systemic instability. However, the documentary lacks explicit LGBTQ+ representation and focuses less on physical or sensory disabilities. Ultimately, the film provides a powerful critique of traditional authority, using martial arts as a metaphor for personal empowerment and cross-cultural discipline.
Category Breakdown
Does Paper Tigers have LGBTQ+ representation?
The film focuses on pedagogical and socioeconomic issues without centering queer narratives or non-cisgender identities. It avoids derogatory stereotypes.
How does Paper Tigers portray gender?
Students of various genders navigate high-stress environments. The film emphasizes emotional intelligence and vulnerability as key leadership qualities.
How racially and ethnically diverse is Paper Tigers?
The documentary features a predominantly non-white cast reflecting urban demographics. Students of color are portrayed as active agents rather than passive victims.
How does Paper Tigers represent religion and culture?
The narrative critiques traditional Western institutions and disciplinary methods. It favors a communal, empathetic approach over rigid hierarchies.
Does Paper Tigers include disability representation?
While physical disabilities are not a focus, the film offers a nuanced look at neurodivergence and mental health. It explores managing trauma and emotional regulation.
Present on Screen
- Provides high ability to act to a predominantly non-white cast, portraying students as active participants in their own lives.
- Subverts gendered clichés by valuing emotional intelligence and vulnerability in high-stress environments.
- Offers a nuanced look at neurodivergence and the psychological realities of trauma and impulse control.
Limited or Absent
- Lacks explicit representation or centering of LGBTQ+ identities and queer narratives.
- Does not focus on physical or sensory disabilities within the student population.
Official Synopsis
Follows a year in the life of an alternative high school that has radically changed its approach to disciplining its students, becoming a promising model for how to break the cycles of poverty, violence and disease that affect families.
Where to Watch
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select or search, Escape to close.
Similar Movies
To Be and to Have
2002
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 4.8 out of 10
Rock and a Hard Place
2017
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 3.7 out of 10
Boys State
2020
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 5.5 out of 10
Whatever It Takes
2009
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 5.8 out of 10
Waiting for "Superman"
2010
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 6.4 out of 10
High School II
1994
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 8.0 out of 10
Bully
2011
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 9.2 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.