
The Little Mouse
1954

1987
RDirector
Hugh Wilson
Runtime
103 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Bernice "Bernie" Rhodenbarr is a burglar by trade, and she runs a bookstore as well. Her friend Carl Hefler is a dog groomer. After a successful burglary, it's discovered that a dead body was in the house she burgled. As she's the only one who can be placed at the scene of the crime, she has to use her criminal skills to clear her name of the murder AND avoid getting charged with the burglary.
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film adheres to standard romantic comedy tropes of the era. It focuses on a traditional romantic pairing between the two leads without exploring non-cisnormative identities.
Gender Representation
Bernice Rhodenbarr disrupts traditional hierarchies as a highly capable female protagonist. Her specialized burglary skills and intellect drive the plot, ensuring she remains an active agent rather than a passive character.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The narrative leans heavily toward a homogeneous, white, upper-middle-class socialite environment. It lacks significant racial or ethnic diversity within the central conflict or supporting cast.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story offers a lighthearted critique of wealth and class structures. It frames theft from the affluent as a charming act of rebellion against capitalist property rights.
Disability Representation
There is no discernible representation of physical, sensory, or neurodivergent disabilities. No such characters appear within the primary arcs or the supporting cast.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Burglar succeeds in subverting gendered expectations by centering the narrative on a woman with high-level professional expertise. Bernice Rhodenbarr is the primary driver of the story's momentum, utilizing her intellect to navigate complex legal and criminal landscapes. However, the film lacks intersectional breadth. The setting is demographically narrow, focusing on a predominantly white, upper-middle-class socialite environment that offers little racial or ethnic variety. It also fails to include any representation of LGBTQ+ identities or disabilities. Ultimately, the film's diversity is rooted in its class critique and gendered competence. While it challenges the moral sanctity of capitalist institutions through a comedic lens, it remains within the traditional social boundaries of its time.

1954

2001

1997

1966

1971

1966

1972

1977

1984

2010

1994

1976
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.