
Concerning Violence
2014

2011
Director
Göran Olsson
Runtime
100 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Examines the evolution of the Black Power Movement in US society from 1967 to 1975. It features footage of the movement shot by Swedish journalists in the United States during that period and includes the appearances of Angela Davis, Bobby Seale, Huey P. Newton, Eldridge Cleaver, and other activists, artists, and leaders central to the movement.
Overall Score
Excellent
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses on racial and political dimensions rather than queer identities. While capturing broader social shifts, it lacks a specific focus on LGBTQ+ liberation narratives.
Gender Representation
Women are presented as central architects of social change rather than passive supporters. Figures like Angela Davis demonstrate significant political leadership and intellectual agency.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
Black identity is the primary lens of this historical record. The film provides deep agency to leaders like Huey P. Newton and Bobby Seale, avoiding tokenism.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The documentary captures extensive anti-establishment and anti-capitalist rhetoric. It frames the struggle against systemic hierarchies as a legitimate response to institutional oppression.
Disability Representation
There is insufficient evidence to assess the representation of visible or invisible disabilities. The focus remains on political and social mobilization.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
The film serves as a restorative historical archive that centers Black agency. By utilizing Swedish archival footage, it avoids a traditional white-centric perspective, allowing activists to drive the discourse through their own rhetoric. Its strength lies in its commitment to centering Black political leadership and its critique of systemic capitalist structures. The narrative architecture emphasizes the intersectional nature of the struggle against established hierarchies. While the film excels in racial and gender representation, it lacks specific focus on LGBTQ+ narratives or disability-related themes, reflecting the specific political scope of the era's documentation.

2014

2020

1992

2016

2012

2022

2009

2024

1986

2020

1960

2022
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.