Up the Junction
1965
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 5.9 out of 10
You are here:
Home
Representation Score
2.9/10
Limited
1972
Director
Lindsay Anderson
Runtime
86 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetNew Showbiz Analysis
Lindsay Anderson's work serves as a sociological examination of class decline rather than a celebration of demographic diversity. While the film lacks racial and LGBTQ+ inclusion, it uses its narrow focus to expose the perceived stability of provincial English life. The narrative structure prioritizes a sophisticated undermining of social and moral hierarchies. It frames the middle class as a decaying institution, using social disruption to reveal systemic hypocrisy. Ultimately, the film's progressive intent lies in its thematic deconstruction of power and authority rather than in identity-based representation.
Category Breakdown
Does Home have LGBTQ+ representation?
The film does not explicitly depict non-straight relationships or same-sex intimacy. Instead, it focuses on traditional heterosexual marriages and social norms.
How does Home portray gender?
The film portrays a strict gender hierarchy that is presented as restrictive and a source of tension. These roles are shown to limit personal freedom.
How racially and ethnically diverse is Home?
The cast is mainly white and uniform, reflecting the local English setting. The film does not include diverse ethnic perspectives or actors from different backgrounds.
How does Home represent religion and culture?
The film effectively critiques traditional Western institutions and the British class system. It presents the polite social order as superficial and hypocritical.
Does Home include disability representation?
There are no significant characters with visible or invisible disabilities that play key roles or serve as plot devices.
Present on Screen
- Sophisticated undermining of traditional social and moral hierarchies.
- Effective critique of the British class system and institutional hypocrisy.
- Challenging the perceived stability of the provincial middle class.
Limited or Absent
- Lack of racial and ethnic diversity within the cast.
- Absence of LGBTQ+ representation or non-straight identities.
- Minimal focus on characters with visible or invisible disabilities.
Official Synopsis
David Storey's adaptation of his award winning play for the BBC's Play for Today series.
Where to Watch
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select or search, Escape to close.
Similar Movies
Meantime
1983
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 5.8 out of 10
The Permissive Society
1975
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 5.3 out of 10
Made in Britain
1983
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 1.4 out of 10
Hard Labour
1973
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 6.3 out of 10
This Sporting Life
1963
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 4.6 out of 10
Grown-Ups
1980
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 5.6 out of 10
Nina
1978
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 3.9 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.