Grown-Ups
1980
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.9 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
Meantime
1983
Not RatedDirector
Mike Leigh
Runtime
107 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
A working-class family in London's East End is struggling to stay afloat during the recession under Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher's premiership. Only the mother Mavis is working; father Frank and the couple's two sons Colin, a timid, chronically shy individual and Mark, an outspoken, headstrong young man, are on the dole. This situation is contrasted by the presence of Mavis's sister Barbara, and her husband John, whose financial and social loftiness appears to be a comfortable facade over the unspoken soreness of a lackluster marriage.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
4.3/10
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film operates within a strictly heteronormative framework. It focuses on domestic and economic pressures without incorporating queer identities or non-cisnormative narratives.
Gender Representation
Mavis disrupts traditional hierarchies by serving as the household's sole provider. This portrayal shifts the provider role away from men, depicting masculinity in a state of crisis.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The story is a localized study of the white working class in London. It maintains a homogeneous cast that does not engage with racial or ethnic intersectionality.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film offers a profound critique of neoliberal capitalism and the Thatcherite era. It frames the economic system as a source of systemic oppression and decay.
Disability Representation
Colin exhibits traits of extreme social anxiety and chronic timidity. His struggles are integrated into the socioeconomic atmosphere rather than serving as a standalone exploration of disability.
Strengths
- Subverts traditional gender roles by centering female economic agency.
- Provides a sophisticated critique of neoliberal capitalism and systemic oppression.
- Avoids romanticizing poverty, offering a realistic view of economic hardship.
Areas for Improvement
- Lacks racial and ethnic intersectionality within the narrative.
- Provides no representation for LGBTQ+ identities or queer perspectives.
- Disability representation is tied to environmental pressure rather than individual agency.
AI Analysis
Mike Leigh’s work provides a sharp, unromanticized look at the working class during the Thatcher era. By centering Mavis as the economic engine of the family, the film subverts traditional patriarchal structures and highlights the stagnation of the men in her life. However, the narrative is limited by its narrow demographic focus. The absence of racial, ethnic, or LGBTQ+ intersectionality keeps the scope confined to a singular, homogeneous experience of the London East End. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its systemic critique. It uses social realism to frame personal dysfunction as a direct symptom of a corrupt and indifferent state.
Similar Movies
Hard Labour
1973
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.5 out of 10
High Hopes
1989
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.4 out of 10
All or Nothing
2002
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.6 out of 10
Bleak Moments
1971
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.6 out of 10
Afternoon
1982
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.2 out of 10
Nuts in May
1976
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.2 out of 10
Naked
1993
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.5 out of 10
Abigail's Party
1977
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.1 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.