Dead Tired
1994
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.7 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
3 Nuts in Search of a Bolt
1964
RDirector
Tommy Noonan
Runtime
78 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
An out-of-work method actor is hired by a male model, an ecdysiast, and a car salesman who live together to save money. They want the actor to listen to their problems and go see a psychiatrist, so they can get counseling for cheap. The psychiatrist is intrigued by the split personalities indicated by the three separate sets of problems presented by the actor, and soon producers are climbing out of the woodwork trying to buy the rights to the film, while the actor is having trouble keeping his act together.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
3.7/10
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
Three men cohabitate to save money, which deviates from the traditional nuclear family. However, the film lacks explicit confirmation of romantic or sexual orientation.
Gender Representation
The story centers on male psychological fragmentation, disrupting era-specific standards of stoic masculinity. The mention of an ecdysiast suggests female bodies may serve as spectacle.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The narrative appears to center on a conventional demographic for 1964. There is no evidence of non-white or non-Anglo-Saxon majority casting.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film offers a cynical view of the entertainment industry and the commodification of trauma. It focuses on professional absurdity rather than systemic critique.
Disability Representation
The plot relies heavily on themes of split personalities and psychological instability. It remains unclear if these conditions provide character agency or serve as comedy.
Strengths
- Disrupts traditional masculine archetypes by portraying men as psychologically fractured and vulnerable.
- Explores the cynical commodification of personal identity within the entertainment industry.
Areas for Improvement
- Lacks explicit representation of queer identity or diverse racial demographics.
- Relies on psychological conditions as a plot engine, which may risk using mental health as a comedic device.
AI Analysis
The film functions as a character-driven comedy centered on psychological instability and the performative nature of identity. It prioritizes individual eccentricity over a structured critique of social hierarchies. While the narrative disrupts traditional masculine stability by presenting men as fractured and unstable, it lacks structural intentionality regarding intersectional representation. The focus remains on the absurdity of the professional landscape. Ultimately, the work reflects the social constraints of its era, offering a narrow view of identity that lacks diverse demographic engagement.
Similar Movies
The D.T.'s
1966
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.0 out of 10
The Lodger
1967
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.4 out of 10
As Long as You've Got Your Health
1966
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.1 out of 10
Ma che colpa abbiamo noi
2003
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.2 out of 10
Going Berserk
1983
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.2 out of 10
Comedian
2000
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.4 out of 10
Hardly Working
1980
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.2 out of 10
Me, Myself and I
1992
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.6 out of 10
Pussycat, Pussycat, I Love You
1970
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.2 out of 10
Psy
1981
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.3 out of 10
TOC TOC
2005
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.7 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.