The Great Man
1956
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.4 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
The World's Greatest Sinner
1962
Director
Timothy Carey
Runtime
77 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
A bored insurance salesman quits his job to go into politics. He first starts preaching about how man is greater than he thinks and that man can live forever. He ends up forming his own political party, "The Eternal Man" party. He begins to be referred to as "God". Then he starts having doubts about the eternalness of man.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
2.8/10
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film centers on mid-century heteronormative social structures. There are no queer narratives or non-cisnormative identities present in the text.
Gender Representation
The narrative is heavily male-centric and adheres to 1960s gender hierarchies. Female characters lack independent agency, serving primarily as extensions of the male protagonist's environment.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The production features a largely homogeneous, white, mid-century American cast. The setting reflects a culturally uniform American town without diverse casting.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film offers a sophisticated critique of institutionalized religion. It deconstructs traditional religious authority by highlighting hypocrisy and the social pressure of communal dogma.
Disability Representation
There is no discernible focus on visible or invisible disabilities. No characters with disabilities appear to be used as plot devices.
Strengths
- Provides a sophisticated critique of institutionalized religion and communal dogma.
- Challenges the perceived sanctity of traditional moral authorities through its narrative.
Areas for Improvement
- Lacks meaningful representation of race, gender, and LGBTQ+ identities.
- Female characters lack independent agency and serve primarily as secondary figures.
- The cast is largely homogeneous and lacks racial or ethnic diversity.
AI Analysis
Timothy Carey’s film is a period-specific drama that mirrors the demographic and social hierarchies of 1962. It lacks meaningful representation regarding race, gender, and LGBTQ+ identity, resulting in a low overall score. However, the film finds strength in its thematic subversion. By critiquing the sanctity of traditional moral authorities and religious institutions, it provides a nuanced look at how dogma enforces social conformity. Ultimately, these intellectual disruptions are not paired with intersectional character development or a diverse cast, leaving the production firmly rooted in a traditionalist framework.
Similar Movies
The Last Hurrah
1958
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.6 out of 10
A Lion Is in the Streets
1953
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.6 out of 10
Curriculum Vitae
1975
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.3 out of 10
Zorba the Greek
1964
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.5 out of 10
Adam at Six A.M.
1970
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.5 out of 10
The Brave Warrior
1968
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.6 out of 10
The President
1961
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.8 out of 10
Meanders
1966
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.7 out of 10
Dirty Hands
1951
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.3 out of 10
The Sensation of Sight
2006
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.0 out of 10
Under the Sign of the Bull
1969
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.4 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.