
Days of Eclipse
1988

1976
Director
Laila Mikkelsen
Runtime
86 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Following political upheaval, traditionally poor countries have stopped exporting raw materials. The Western world is entering an economic crisis, which is rapidly spreading to Norway. Unemployment rises sharply, and it becomes more difficult to obtain food. The government does not officially acknowledge the crisis, but fear spreads among the population. Demonstrations between the population and the police are now a daily occurrence. Thomas and Vera are also unemployed. The only way out of their predicament is to move out of the city and rent an abandoned farm. The sale of food is banned. Military forces arrive to confiscate what little they have. Later, the city population follows, traveling to the countryside in panic to secure something to eat.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The narrative centers on the partnership between Thomas and Vera. There is no explicit mention of non-heteronormative identities or same-sex intimacy within the story.
Gender Representation
The film disrupts traditional hierarchies by placing characters in a survivalist context. Vera and Thomas navigate unemployment and state aggression as a unit, emphasizing shared vulnerability.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The story focuses on a localized crisis within Norway. The character focus appears to be on a homogeneous population, prioritizing class struggle over multi-ethnic intersectionality.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film offers a sharp critique of capitalist stability and state institutions. It portrays the government as untrustworthy and the military as a force of confiscation.
Disability Representation
There is no information available regarding the presence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Oss is a socio-political critique that prioritizes systemic collapse over individual identity politics. It succeeds as a cultural commentary by deconstructing the perceived competence of Western state institutions and the stability of the social contract. However, the film lacks intersectional depth. The narrative focus remains narrow, centering on a homogeneous Norwegian population and a central heterosexual partnership, leaving little room for diverse racial or queer perspectives. Ultimately, the film's impact is found in its thematic architecture. It trades traditional character archetypes for a study of how economic scarcity and state aggression dismantle established social orders.

1988

1985

2017

2012

1983

2001

2018

2018

1962

1971

2019
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.