You are here:

O-Bi, O-Ba: The End of Civilization

Name: O-Bi, O-Ba: The End of Civilization
Director: Piotr Szulkin
Released: 1985
Duration: 89 min

Representation Score

4.9/10

Fair

1985

Director

Piotr Szulkin

Runtime

89 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

O-Bi, O-Ba is a profound postmodern critique that focuses on the breakdown of societal structures. It succeeds as a sociopolitical allegory, using science fiction to deconstruct totalitarianism and the failure of human institutions. However, the film's narrow, confined setting limits its visibility of various identities. The focus on universal human entropy and biological survival leaves little room for specific identity-based representation in terms of race, gender, or sexuality. Ultimately, the work is a study of institutional decay rather than a showcase of diverse human identities.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does O-Bi, O-Ba: The End of Civilization have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film focuses on survival in a confined space. There is no representation of LGBTQ+ identities or same-sex relationships.

How does O-Bi, O-Ba: The End of Civilization portray gender?

Fair

Gender roles are defined by the needs of a failing society. The film does not challenge traditional gender hierarchies.

How racially and ethnically diverse is O-Bi, O-Ba: The End of Civilization?

Limited

The underground setting leads to a mostly uniform population. The story lacks racial diversity and varied ethnic backgrounds.

How does O-Bi, O-Ba: The End of Civilization represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film effectively critiques the stability of governing systems. It portrays these systems as irrational, dehumanizing, and corrupt.

Does O-Bi, O-Ba: The End of Civilization include disability representation?

Limited

Physical and mental decline is shown as a universal sign of societal collapse. Disabilities might symbolize the decay of civilization.

Present on Screen

Sophisticated deconstruction of oppressive, dehumanizing state structures.
High-level critique of institutional stability and authority.
Profound exploration of moral relativism in extreme circumstances.

Limited or Absent

Lack of representation of gender and sexual diversity.
Minimal racial and ethnic diversity among the characters.
Absence of detailed portrayal of disabilities.

Official Synopsis

The world has been ravaged by nuclear war. The planet is frozen and radiation kills anyone or anything that ventures outside of 'The Dome'. Soft is a shepherd for the last remnants of humanity who have gathered together as they await rescue from a mysterious craft known only as 'The Ark.' He wanders among the masses, performing his regular daily tasks; keeping morale from plummeting, wooing prostitutes, squashing rebellions, and sometimes feeding the hungry. But as the true and sinister nature of 'The Dome' comes to light, Soft must ask himself if humanity is worth saving...

How are these scores produced? →