Pero… ¡en qué país vivimos!
1967
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.8 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
El alma se serena
1970
Director
José Luis Sáenz de Heredia
Average Rating
No ratings yetWhere to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
2.9/10
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks intentional LGBTQ+ inclusion or queer-coded character arcs. There is no evidence of the narrative critiquing heteronormativity or presenting non-cisnormative gender expressions.
Gender Representation
The production likely reinforces traditional gender hierarchies common to the era. Female agency appears secondary to established social structures rather than driving the plot through intellectual or social subversion.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The film reflects the demographic homogeneity of 1970s Spain. There is no evidence of intersectional casting or the use of non-white protagonists to challenge Eurocentric norms.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
Thematic elements suggest a focus on spiritual equilibrium and traditional moralities. The narrative architecture favors stability and conventional values over the deconstruction of religious or family institutions.
Disability Representation
Disability is not a central narrative component. There is no evidence of characters with disabilities serving as significant agents within the story.
Strengths
- The film provides a clear window into the traditional cinematic and social frameworks of mid-20th-century Spain.
Areas for Improvement
- The film lacks LGBTQ+ representation and queer-coded character arcs.
- Gender roles reinforce traditional hierarchies rather than offering female agency.
- The cast lacks racial and ethnic diversity, reflecting period homogeneity.
- The narrative fails to challenge or deconstruct traditional religious or social institutions.
AI Analysis
El alma se serena is a product of its time, adhering to the conventional social and cinematic frameworks of 1970s Spain. The film prioritizes established hierarchies and traditional moralities, offering little room for systemic subversion or intersectional perspectives. The narrative lacks representation for LGBTQ+ identities and diverse ethnic groups, reflecting the demographic homogeneity of the period. Gender roles appear to follow standard mid-century structures where female agency is limited. Ultimately, the film functions as a traditional comedy that reinforces rather than challenges the cultural and religious status quo of its era.
Similar Movies
Me debes un muerto
1971
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.1 out of 10
El recomendado
1985
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.9 out of 10
El hombre que perdió el tren
1960
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.0 out of 10
El chocolate del loro
2004
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.2 out of 10
El cura ya tiene hijo
1984
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.8 out of 10
Shake Before Use
1983
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.6 out of 10
Jenaro, el de los 14
1974
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.3 out of 10
El virgo de Visanteta
1979
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.1 out of 10
Una monja y un Don Juan
1973
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.8 out of 10
Los fierecillos se divierten
1983
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.8 out of 10
Los embarazados
1982
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.1 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.