You are here:

Yes, Yes, Nanette

Yes, Yes, Nanette

Representation Score

1.4/10

Minimal

1925

Passed

Director

Stan Laurel, Clarence Hennecke

Runtime

11 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

The film operates within the rigid social and demographic constraints of the 1920s. It relies on standard comedic clichés of social embarrassment and romantic rivalry to drive the plot. While directed by Stan Laurel, known for later works that subvert authority, this early work follows a conventional arc. It reinforces traditional Western social and family structures without challenging them. Ultimately, the film lacks the intentionality needed to disrupt established hierarchies, functioning instead as a standard situational comedy centered on domestic friction.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Yes, Yes, Nanette have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film centers on a traditional romantic triangle involving a wife, her husband, and a former lover. There is no indication of LGBTQ+ identities or same-sex relationships.

How does Yes, Yes, Nanette portray gender?

Limited

Nanette serves as the catalyst for the plot, but the main conflict revolves around male social standing. The comedy hinges on the vulnerability and loss of dignity of male characters.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Yes, Yes, Nanette?

Minimal

The narrative does not include any diverse cast or multi-layered casting. It seems to adhere to the homogeneous casting standards typical of 1925 American cinema.

How does Yes, Yes, Nanette represent religion and culture?

Limited

The story upholds traditional Western social structures and the sanctity of the family unit. It uses domestic settings to reinforce standard social norms without critiquing them.

Does Yes, Yes, Nanette include disability representation?

Minimal

The synopsis does not provide any information about characters with visible or invisible disabilities.

Present on Screen

  • Features early direction by Stan Laurel, who would later become a master of subverting comedic structures.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities, focusing solely on a traditional romantic triangle.
  • Relies on gendered clichés where male social standing and dignity drive the central conflict.
  • Shows no evidence of racial or ethnic diversity, reflecting the era's homogeneous casting norms.
  • Reinforces traditional Western social and family structures without offering any cultural critique.

Official Synopsis

Nanette sends a letter to her family telling of her new husband, Hillory. When Hillory arrives to meet the family, he gets insulted by each member, including the dog, and loses his wig. After having dinner with the family, Nanette's former lover returns, and Hillory must confront him

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.