You are here:

Return to Reason: Four Films by Man Ray

Return to Reason: Four Films by Man Ray

Representation Score

4.1/10

Fair

2024

Director

Man Ray

Runtime

70 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

The screen is black, then a white circle expands and contracts like a breathing lung. This is not a film with a plot; it is a series of photographic studies animated by light and shadow. The collection, curated with a new score by SQÜRL, presents four short films by Man Ray, where the human face is treated not as a window to the soul, but as a surface to be played with. The camera loves Kiki de Montparnasse. She is the "holy" object of the gaze, her features sharp and unyielding, staring back with a flat, challenging intensity. The sold meaning is that art is the manipulation of perception. The "normal" is the distortion; the cost is the loss of stable identity. The film’s argument is that reality is subjective, proven by the relentless focus on the fragment. In *Emak-Bakia*, the camera zooms in and out, warping Kiki’s face into a caricature. This is not a slapstick gag but a visual pun on the nature of perception. The "joke" is that the viewer’s expectation of a stable human face is subverted. Man Ray, the director, never pays the price for the intrusion. He manipulates the image, distorts the face, and controls the light, but he remains outside the frame. Kiki is the one who is "harmed" by the distortion, but she is also the one who is "elevated" by it. She is the subject of the experiment, not the experimenter. The ending does not resolve a plot but freezes a moment of surrealist distortion. The final image is a static, high-contrast photograph of a woman’s face dissolving into abstract geometric shapes. This rewards the viewer with an aesthetic of fragmentation rather than narrative closure. The film treats the body as a site of experimentation. The distortion of Kiki’s face is a sexual act in the sense that it is an intimate, invasive exploration of the self. The "moral" is not stated but implied by the relentless focus on the fragment. The last image is the argument: identity is unstable, and the only truth is the image.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Return to Reason: Four Films by Man Ray have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

No romantic or sexual relationships are depicted. The focus remains on visual experimentation and the artist’s gaze rather than interpersonal dynamics or identity exploration.

How does Return to Reason: Four Films by Man Ray portray gender?

Fair

Kiki de Montparnasse anchors the screen as a visual object, her face fragmented by light. She is observed rather than acting, serving as the subject of the artist’s control and compositional design.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Return to Reason: Four Films by Man Ray?

Minimal

Racial diversity is entirely absent from the frame. The cast reflects the specific 1920s Parisian avant-garde context, featuring only white figures within the artistic studio setting.

How does Return to Reason: Four Films by Man Ray represent religion and culture?

Good

The artistic studio replaces traditional family structures as the primary social unit. The work immerses viewers in the surreal, dreamlike world of the Dadaist movement and its experimental visual language.

Does Return to Reason: Four Films by Man Ray include disability representation?

Minimal

Disability is not depicted in the narrative. Physical distortions of the face and body are purely aesthetic choices, serving the film’s exploration of perception rather than functional impairment.

Present on Screen

  • Kiki de Montparnasse serves as the visual anchor, her face fragmented by high-contrast light.
  • Man Ray appears as the invisible operator, controlling the lens rather than appearing in frame.
  • Robert Desnos provides the poetic text, framing the visual experiments as dreamlike.
  • André de la Rivière appears as a silhouette, a compositional element rather than a character.

Limited or Absent

  • Narrative agency is absent; the woman is observed, not acting within a plot.
  • Racial diversity is entirely missing, reflecting the 1920s Parisian avant-garde context.
  • Disability is not depicted; physical distortion is aesthetic, not functional.
  • Traditional family structures are replaced by the artistic studio as the primary social unit.

Official Synopsis

An immersion into the surreal and dreamlike world of painter, photographer and filmmaker Man Ray (1890-1976), one of the most prolific American visual artists, through four of his short films, brought to life by the atmospheric music of SQÜRL.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.