You are here:
They Call Us Monsters

They Call Us Monsters

2016

Not Rated

Director

Ben Lear

Runtime

82 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Behind the walls of the Compound, LA’s most violent juvenile offenders await their trials. To their advocates, they’re kids. To the system, they’re adults. To their victims, they’re monsters. Who are they to you?

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

6.8/10

Good


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The documentary lacks an intentional focus on LGBTQ+ identities. It does not feature queer-coded storytelling or narratives specifically addressing heteronormativity.

Gender Representation

Fair

The film explores how gendered experiences intersect with mental health and legal status. It avoids monolithic portrayals by showing how different socializations influence navigation of institutional authority.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Good

The narrative features a diverse cast of color, reflecting the disproportionate impact of systemic instability on marginalized communities. Race and ethnicity are integrated into the core storytelling.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The film critiques traditional Western institutions, portraying the American healthcare and juvenile justice systems as flawed, punitive structures. It prioritizes individual lived truth over institutional authority.

Disability Representation

Excellent

This is the film's strongest area, humanizing individuals with severe mental health conditions like schizophrenia. It grants subjects agency rather than using neurodivergence as a mere spectacle.

Strengths

  • Humanizes severe mental health conditions by granting subjects agency and dignity.
  • Provides a diverse cast that reflects the disproportionate impact of systemic instability on marginalized communities.
  • Critically examines the failures of Western healthcare and juvenile justice institutions.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks explicit focus or intentional representation of LGBTQ+ identities and queer narratives.

AI Analysis

Ben Lear’s documentary succeeds by shifting the lens from individual criminality to systemic failure. It effectively deconstructs the 'monster' trope, moving the audience from judgment toward a deeper understanding of how institutional neglect shapes lives. The film's greatest strength lies in its profound engagement with disability and mental health. By presenting the unvarnished reality of neurodivergence, it avoids exploitative tropes and grants significant agency to its subjects. While the film excels in racial and cultural critique, it offers little engagement with LGBTQ+ narratives. The focus remains primarily on the intersection of mental health, race, and the carceral system.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.