You are here:

For Better, for Worse

Name: For Better, for Worse
Director: Cecil B. DeMille
Released: 1919
Duration: 90 min

Representation Score

2.6/10

Limited

1919

Director

Cecil B. DeMille

Runtime

90 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

For Better, for Worse is a period drama set in 1919 that closely follows the social and moral norms of its time. The narrative structure emphasizes traditional romantic clichés and upholds established social hierarchies, providing little disruption to the status quo. The film heavily relies on traditional views of courage and duty. While it delves into complex interpersonal relationships, it does so within a framework that reinforces the romantic and marital norms of the early 20th century. The plot includes significant engagement with physical disability, using these elements primarily as catalysts for dramatic tension. The production reflects the era's homogeneous cast and traditional Western cultural values.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does For Better, for Worse have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film focuses on a traditional love triangle involving two men and one woman. It does not include any characters with non-binary gender identities or challenge the assumption that everyone is straight.

How does For Better, for Worse portray gender?

Limited

Sylvia acts as the emotional center, evaluating men based on traditional standards of bravery. The story uses conventional gender roles to create the main conflict.

How racially and ethnically diverse is For Better, for Worse?

Minimal

The story seems to revolve around a cast that is mostly of the same ethnicity. There is no indication of diverse casting or inclusion of characters from different ethnic backgrounds.

How does For Better, for Worse represent religion and culture?

Limited

Themes of duty and marriage reflect traditional Western values. Conflicts arise when characters deviate from societal norms, but there are no deeper critiques of systemic issues.

Does For Better, for Worse include disability representation?

Fair

The plot involves physical disabilities through Dr. Meade’s work and Burton’s injuries. These elements often serve as symbols of tragedy or moral tests.

Present on Screen

The narrative incorporates physical disability as a key element driving the plot.

Limited or Absent

The film lacks racial and ethnic diversity, focusing on a homogeneous cast.
The story reinforces traditional gender hierarchies and conventional romantic structures.
There is no representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisgender perspectives.

Official Synopsis

Dr. Edward Meade and friend Richard Burton both love Sylvia Norcross. Both enlist in the military, but Meade stays back to care for deformed children. Sylvia thinks him a coward and marries Burton. After Burton is presumed dead, Meade and Sylvia are to wed, but Burton returns maimed and scarred.

How are these scores produced? →