You are here:
Victory Day

Victory Day

2018

Director

Sergei Loznitsa

Runtime

94 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Every year, on the 9th of May, people gather in Treptower Park in Berlin. They come dressed in their best outfits or in Soviet military uniform. They carry flags, banners and posters. They lay flowers at the monument to the Soviet soldier; they sing, dance and drink. They celebrate the victory of the Soviet Union over Nazi Germany.The film is a direct reportage from Treptower Park 72 years after the victory.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

3.8/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film contains a complete absence of LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. The archival Soviet newsreels reflect the rigid social structures of the era, which did not permit visibility for non-cisnormative identities.

Gender Representation

Limited

The narrative reinforces traditional hierarchies by positioning men as primary agents of combat and leadership. Women are largely relegated to symbolic roles, such as figures of mourning or personifications of the Motherland.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The film displays moderate diversity through the Soviet 'friendship of peoples' doctrine. While various ethnicities appear, they are presented through a framework of state-sanctioned multiculturalism designed to bolster national unity.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The work scores highly by focusing on secularism and prioritizing a non-Western, anti-capitalist historical perspective. It functions as a deconstruction of how institutions manufacture truth and ritual to maintain power.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no discernible representation of physical or neurodivergent disabilities. Subjects in the newsreels are presented as a homogenized, able-bodied collective to serve the state's imagery of strength.

Strengths

  • Provides a sophisticated cultural critique of how institutions manufacture historical truth.
  • Offers a non-Western, anti-capitalist perspective that challenges dominant historical narratives.
  • Utilizes a diverse range of ethnicities through the lens of Soviet multiculturalism.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks any representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-heteronormative narratives.
  • Reinforces traditional gender hierarchies by relegating women to symbolic or domestic roles.
  • Fails to include any representation of physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

AI Analysis

Sergei Loznitsa’s documentary uses archival Soviet newsreels to examine how historical memory is manufactured. While the film succeeds as a sophisticated semiotic study of state-driven ritual, it remains tethered to the limitations of its source material. The reliance on state-sanctioned archives results in a lack of representation for LGBTQ+ individuals and people with disabilities. These absences reflect the era's rigid social structures and the state's preference for a homogenized, able-bodied collective. Gender roles are strictly binary, emphasizing masculine combat and feminine symbolism. However, the film finds strength in its cultural critique, challenging Western-centric narratives through a lens of state-driven atheism and postmodern deconstruction.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.