The Ghost Talks
1949
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.2 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
Oily to Bed, Oily to Rise
1939
NRDirector
Jules White
Runtime
18 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Once again, the Stooges are three hapless tramps. After nearly destroying a farmer's (Richard Fiske) pile of firewood, the boys come to the assistance of the Widow Jenkins (Eva McKenzie), who has just been cheated out of her land by a trio of swindlers (Dick Curtis, Eddie Laughton, James Craig). Attempting to fix the woman's well, the Stooges instead unleash an oil geyser. They manage to retrieve the deed to the land and are allowed to marry the now wealthy Widow Jenkins' daughters. Moe tells Curly to wish for quintuplets, and Curly replies, "We'll honeymoon in Canada!" (a reference to the Dionne quintuplets).
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
1.6/10
Minimal
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film adheres to strict heteronormative structures. The plot centers on marriage and traditional romantic pursuits, offering no presence of non-cisnormative identities.
Gender Representation
Female characters serve primarily as plot catalysts or prizes for the male protagonists. While they hold the wealth, they lack individual agency in the narrative.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The cast appears homogeneous, reflecting the Anglo-centric casting norms of 1939. There is no visible effort to include diverse ethnic backgrounds.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story reinforces Western social structures and the importance of property ownership. It aligns with conservative ideals regarding domesticity and the nuclear family.
Disability Representation
No characters with disabilities are portrayed with agency. The slapstick comedy relies on physical clumsiness rather than meaningful representation of disability.
Strengths
- The film provides a clear, quintessential example of 1930s slapstick comedy archetypes.
Areas for Improvement
- The narrative lacks agency for female characters, treating them as objects to be won.
- The casting is homogeneous and fails to represent diverse ethnic backgrounds.
- The plot reinforces traditional social hierarchies rather than subverting them.
- There is no meaningful representation of disability or non-cisnormative identities.
AI Analysis
This Three Stooges short is a product of its era, prioritizing slapstick tropes over any exploration of identity. The narrative reinforces existing social hierarchies rather than challenging them. The film relies on traditional gender roles and heteronormative outcomes to drive its comedy. It functions within a narrow, homogeneous framework typical of 1930s American media. Ultimately, the work lacks diversity across all measured categories, focusing instead on conventional social stability and physical humor.
Similar Movies
Beer Barrel Polecats
1946
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.3 out of 10
Fiddlers Three
1948
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.3 out of 10
Boobs in Arms
1940
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.6 out of 10
Pardon My Backfire
1953
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.3 out of 10
I'll Never Heil Again
1941
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.4 out of 10
Idiots Deluxe
1945
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.4 out of 10
Rhythm and Weep
1946
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.0 out of 10
Half-Wits Holiday
1947
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.4 out of 10
So Long Mr. Chumps
1941
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.7 out of 10
Gypped in the Penthouse
1955
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.6 out of 10
G.I. Wanna Home
1946
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.8 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.