You are here:

Smoking

Smoking

Representation Score

5.7/10

Fair

1993

Director

Alain Resnais

Runtime

139 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Alain Resnais employs an experimental narrative structure to explore the instability of identity. With two actors playing eighteen roles, the film critiques traditional identity constructs. The film's strength lies in its ability to challenge conventional character development through its innovative casting. This approach highlights identity as a dynamic construct rather than a static entity. However, while the narrative framework supports progressive themes, the film's specific demographic makeup remains unspecified. Visual representations of race and disability are not explicitly detailed.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Smoking have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film's frequent shifts in identity suggest a flexible presentation of sexual orientation. This approach creates a foundation for exploring diverse sexualities and gender expressions.

How does Smoking portray gender?

Good

By allowing actors to play multiple gendered roles, the film challenges traditional gender roles. This approach emphasizes the fluidity of gender performance.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Smoking?

Fair

Produced in Europe, the film may reflect a predominantly white cast. However, its abstract structure prioritizes psychological complexity over ethnic diversity.

How does Smoking represent religion and culture?

Good

The storyline dismantles a predetermined moral universe by emphasizing how small choices shape a person's life. This favors a subjective, modern perspective on existence.

Does Smoking include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no information available to assess the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

Present on Screen

  • The film's metamorphic casting technique effectively disrupts traditional, stable character archetypes.
  • The narrative structure promotes a progressive view of identity as a fluid construct.
  • The film's focus on minor choices offers a sophisticated exploration of human subjectivity.

Limited or Absent

  • The film lacks clear evidence regarding the portrayal of physical and neurodivergent disabilities.
  • The European production context may limit racial and ethnic diversity.
  • Details about the diversity of romantic pairings and sexual orientations are not clearly defined.

Official Synopsis

Two actors play eighteen different roles in a story that asks the question: would my life have been different if I had lit a cigarette?

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.