You are here:

No Smoking

No Smoking

Representation Score

7.0/10

Good

1993

Director

Alain Resnais

Runtime

141 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Alain Resnais's *No Smoking* is a sophisticated exercise in postmodernism that prioritizes intellectual complexity over demographic breadth. It achieves a progressive sensibility through formal experimentation, using a non-linear structure to challenge the stability of identity and traditional Western moral frameworks. However, the film's focus is deeply inward and Eurocentric. While it successfully deconstructs social roles and gender hierarchies through its 'what if' conceit, it lacks depth in racial or LGBTQ+ representation. Ultimately, the work is a cerebral exploration of the human condition. It succeeds as a deconstructionist piece of storytelling but remains limited by its specific, high-culture European demographic.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does No Smoking have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film explores identity through a fragmented, postmodern lens where actors inhabit shifting roles. While it doesn't have explicit queer narratives, the structural conceit disrupts fixed ideas of self.

How does No Smoking portray gender?

Good

Resnais subverts traditional gender hierarchies by focusing on psychological interiority. Both men and women are shown as equally susceptible to existential doubt, avoiding clichés of male leadership or female submissiveness.

How racially and ethnically diverse is No Smoking?

Limited

The setting reflects a homogeneous, upper-middle-class European environment. The narrative remains inward and existential, lacking intentional racial blending or the subversion of Eurocentric casting norms.

How does No Smoking represent religion and culture?

Good

The film embraces moral relativism and the subjectivity of truth. It prioritizes a secular, existentialist framework over religious or patriotic dogma, favoring individual perception over institutional values.

Does No Smoking include disability representation?

Limited

There is no significant representation of physical or neurodivergent disabilities. The film metaphorically explores the 'disability' of unreliable memory rather than using disability as a central identity.

Present on Screen

  • Subverts traditional gender hierarchies by emphasizing psychological interiority over social utility.
  • Challenges fixed identities through a fragmented, multi-role narrative structure.
  • Promotes a sophisticated, secular exploration of moral relativism and subjective truth.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks racial and ethnic diversity, remaining confined to a homogeneous European milieu.
  • Fails to include explicit LGBTQ+ narratives or non-assuming gender matches what was assigned at birth gender politics.
  • Provides no meaningful representation of physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

Official Synopsis

Two actors play eighteen different roles in a story that asks the question: would my life have been different if I hadn't lit a cigarette?

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.