You are here:

Our Nazi

Name: Our Nazi
Director: Robert Kramer
Released: 1984
Duration: 94 min

Representation Score

2.9/10

Limited

1984

Director

Robert Kramer

Runtime

94 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Robert Kramer’s documentary deconstructs historical memory with an intellectual focus on disrupting conventional narratives. It prioritizes exposing the complicity within post-war German society over demographic inclusion. The film’s impact comes from its critique of systemic structures rather than identity-based representation. It challenges the legitimacy of dominant historical narratives by highlighting the everyday ways individuals maintain the status quo. While the film lacks traditional markers of diversity, its strength lies in its sophisticated critique of Western institutions and the professional masks hiding historical guilt.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Our Nazi have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not include any explicit LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. Its focus is on the political ideology and the psychological state of post-war Germany.

How does Our Nazi portray gender?

Fair

The film explores how traditional masculine hierarchies evolved into post-war professional environments. It examines the shift in patriarchal power without emphasizing women's ability to drive the story.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Our Nazi?

Limited

The film focuses on the homogeneous white establishment in West Germany, critiquing how specific national identities avoided accountability through systemic protections.

How does Our Nazi represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film effectively critiques Western institutions and capitalism, framing the post-war economic boom as a tool for moral evasion and systemic corruption.

Does Our Nazi include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no significant depiction of physical or neurodivergent disabilities in the film.

Present on Screen

Powerful critique of Western capitalism and traditional institutional morality.
Sophisticated deconstruction of historical memory and systemic complicity.
Strong directorial approach in challenging established power dynamics.

Limited or Absent

Lacks explicit LGBTQ+ representation or narratives.
Minimal engagement with racial or ethnic diversity beyond localized German studies.
Does not feature significant depictions of disability.

Official Synopsis

In Our Nazi, we are plunged into a situation we barely, and only slowly, understand: the filming of Thomas Harlan’s experimental feature Wundkanal (1984), in which true-life ex-SS officer Alfred Filbert, now very old, is ‘put on trial’ for the camera, without him suspecting what is to come or why he is really there. Kramer’s confronting film is an essay about the sticky complicity of everyone present at this event, each bringing their own history, their own political ideology, their own desires to take revenge, to seek redemption or compassion, or just to put their heads down and ‘get the job done’ professionally, or (in the case of Filbert) to be a star, a part of the magnificent, magical, seductive world of cinema, even if it kills him.

How are these scores produced? →