
The Strange Type
1963

1938
SDirector
Pierre-Jean Ducis
Runtime
100 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Because of the escapades of Alexis, the Crown Prince of Vodenia, the kingdom is likely to lose the loan lent to them by a rich foreign banker. Baron Patcheff, a minister, decides then to replace the Prince by a double. The man chosen is Castin, a Parisian haberdasher, who looks like Alexis feature for feature.
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks any depiction of non-heteronormative identities or same-sex intimacy. It follows a conventional comedic framework typical of 1930s European cinema.
Gender Representation
The story centers on the escapades of a male prince and the political machinations of a male minister. Power dynamics and economic agency are framed through a traditional masculine lens.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The narrative focuses on class distinctions between a Parisian tradesman and European royalty. There is no evidence of non-white character agency within the fictional kingdom of Vodenia.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The plot relies on maintaining royal dignity and a kingdom's financial stability. It operates within a traditional framework of class-based comedy and institutional stability.
Disability Representation
There are no mentions of characters with visible or invisible disabilities. No assessment of neurodivergence or physical impairments is possible.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Un fichu métier is a traditional period comedy that prioritizes themes of class substitution and political preservation. The narrative architecture is built around a royal double and a Parisian haberdasher, adhering to the standard cinematic tropes of the late 1930s. The film lacks intersectional complexity, focusing instead on Western social hierarchies and the maintenance of a monarchy. The central conflict involves protecting a state loan and the integrity of a royal bloodline. Because the story revolves around masculine political agency and conventional social standards, it offers little disruption to traditional hierarchies or diverse representation.

1963

1920

1958

1978

1984

1938

1972

1956

2013
1933

1963

1984
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.