You are here:
Mazzabubù... quante corna stanno quaggiù?

Mazzabubù... quante corna stanno quaggiù?

1971

Director

Mariano Laurenti

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

During a monologue on the theme of adultery, a man reviews a series of famous and anonymous cases of conjugal betrayals ...

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

2.8/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks any evidence of LGBTQ+ characters or non-cisnormative identities. It appears to adhere to the conventional heteronormative frameworks typical of 1971 domestic comedies.

Gender Representation

Fair

The narrative focuses on adultery and marital infidelity, which centers on gendered power dynamics. It remains unclear if the film subverts or reinforces traditional domestic hierarchies through its caricatures.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

Reflecting the localized Italian social landscape of the early 1970s, the cast and setting appear homogeneous. There is no significant emphasis on racial or ethnic plurality.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Limited

The film uses comedic monologues to frame infidelity, suggesting a degree of moral relativism. This approach treats the nuclear family as a site of absurdity rather than rigid moralism.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no indication of characters with visible or invisible disabilities within the narrative. The film does not address disability as a thematic element.

Strengths

  • The film offers a comedic deconstruction of traditional marital fidelity.
  • It utilizes moral relativism to present the nuclear family as a site of dysfunction.

Areas for Improvement

  • The narrative lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities and non-cisnormative perspectives.
  • There is a notable absence of racial, ethnic, or disability-related diversity.
  • The film relies on established gendered tropes regarding domestic betrayal.

AI Analysis

Mazzabubù... quante corna stanno quaggiù? is a period-specific comedy that operates within the narrow demographic boundaries of its era. It focuses on the breakdown of traditional domestic structures through an episodic examination of adultery. The film lacks intersectional complexity and provides no agency for marginalized groups. While it satirizes the instability of marriage, it does so through a lens that remains largely conventional and homogeneous. Ultimately, the work functions as a genre-driven satire of social mores rather than a systemic critique of identity or social structures.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.