New Showbiz

You are here:
The Poisoner's Handbook

The Poisoner's Handbook

2014

TV-14

Director

Rob Rapley

Runtime

112 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

In 1918, New York City hired its first scientifically trained medical examiner, Charles Norris. Over the course of a decade and a half, Norris and his extraordinarily driven and talented chief toxicologist, Alexander Gettler, would turn forensic chemistry into a formidable science, sending many a murderer to the electric chair and setting the standards that the rest of the country would ultimately adopt.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

5.5/10

Fair

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The documentary maintains a strictly historical and scientific focus. There are no depictions of non-cisnormative identities or same-sex intimacy.

Gender Representation

Limited

The narrative centers on male-dominated spheres of early 20th-century medicine and law. While historically accurate, the film lacks female presence in scientific or investigative authority.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Excellent

The film provides significant agency to Charles Norris, an African American medical examiner. It highlights his role navigating racial segregation to impact systemic institutional change.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The documentary critiques unregulated capitalism and the adulteration of consumer goods. It frames corporate negligence as a systemic failure that disproportionately harmed the poor.

Disability Representation

Minimal

The film examines the physiological effects of toxins on the human body. However, it does not feature characters with permanent disabilities as central narrative agents.

Strengths

  • Centers an African American professional in a high-stakes scientific role.
  • Challenges traditional tropes of historical medical narratives.
  • Critiques how unregulated industries disproportionately harm marginalized socioeconomic groups.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks female presence in positions of scientific or investigative authority.
  • Focuses almost exclusively on male-dominated spheres of medicine and law.

AI Analysis

The film succeeds by centering Black professional agency through the character of Charles Norris. By highlighting his expertise in a segregated era, the documentary disrupts traditional medical histories and emphasizes the role of Black scientists in institutional reform. However, the narrative is heavily skewed toward male intellectual agency. While this reflects the historical reality of the early 1900s, the lack of female scientific or investigative figures limits the scope of representation. Ultimately, the documentary provides a nuanced critique of industrial capitalism. It shifts the focus from mere scientific progress to how scientific truth protects vulnerable populations from corporate negligence.

How are these scores produced? →

Similar Movies

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.