You are here:

The Judge and the Assassin

The Judge and the Assassin

Representation Score

3.2/10

Limited

1976

Director

Bertrand Tavernier

Runtime

128 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

The film focuses on historical realism, emphasizing the deconstruction of institutional power rather than modern demographic representation. It explores the tension between systemic authority and individual ability to act through a 19th-century lens. While the film lacks diversity in terms of identity-based inclusion, it achieves progressive value by questioning the corruption and flaws in state structures. The narrative challenges the idea of institutional infallibility. Ultimately, the film's emphasis is on the conflict between law and morality, using its historical setting to critique centralized authority rather than showcasing a diverse cast.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does The Judge and the Assassin have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film is set in a historical context where everyone is assumed to be straight or cisgender, with no representation of LGBTQ+ identities or narratives.

How does The Judge and the Assassin portray gender?

Limited

The story revolves around male-dominated legal institutions, where women play a supporting role, acting as catalysts for male actions rather than having their own independent roles.

How racially and ethnically diverse is The Judge and the Assassin?

Limited

Set in 1893 France, the film reflects the homogeneous demographics of the time, focusing on a localized European social structure.

How does The Judge and the Assassin represent religion and culture?

Good

The film provides a critical look at Western institutions, portraying the judicial system as a tool for personal gain rather than objective justice.

Does The Judge and the Assassin include disability representation?

Fair

Mental health issues and physical injuries are used as narrative devices to create chaos and drive the plot forward.

Present on Screen

  • Offers a sophisticated critique of traditional Western institutions and judicial corruption.
  • Examines the tension between systemic authority and individual ability to act through historical settings.

Limited or Absent

  • Does not include representation of non-straight or non-cisgender identities or narratives.
  • Women are portrayed as catalysts for male action rather than having their own independent roles.
  • Mental health conditions are used primarily as plot devices for chaos.

Official Synopsis

France, 1893. Joseph Bouvier attempts to shoot his love who refused to marry him and to commit suicide. Upon release from the filthy asylum where he was placed, with bullets still remaining in his head, he wanders the country roads and rapes and murders many teenagers over years. The judge Rousseau captures him, but to serve his ambition seeks to avoid that Bouvier is simply declared insane.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.