That Obscure Object of Desire
1977
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 6.6 out of 10
You are here:
The Pornographers
Representation Score
5.7/10
Fair
1966
Not RatedDirector
Shōhei Imamura
Runtime
128 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetNew Showbiz Analysis
Shōhei Imamura’s work functions as a disruption of rigid post-war Japanese social hierarchies. By centering characters on the periphery of conventional morality, the film uses a naturalistic lens to challenge established institutional norms. The film excels in its subversion of traditional gender hierarchies and its critique of systemic morality. However, the narrative remains limited by its lack of LGBTQ+ representation and its culturally homogeneous cast, which reflects the historical context of 1960s Japanese cinema.
Category Breakdown
Does The Pornographers have LGBTQ+ representation?
The film does not include explicit LGBTQ+ identities or narratives that go beyond traditional heterosexual relationships. Instead, it explores primal instincts within a traditional sexual framework.
How does The Pornographers portray gender?
Women play a significant role in driving the story and have sexual autonomy, rather than being passive subjects. The narrative centers on female desire and economic survival, disrupting patriarchal control.
How racially and ethnically diverse is The Pornographers?
The cast is culturally homogeneous, reflecting the production constraints of the time. It serves as an exploration of domestic identity rather than an exercise in diverse racial representation.
How does The Pornographers represent religion and culture?
The film critiques institutionalized morality by emphasizing human instinct over religious decorum. It portrays anti-social activities as natural, challenging the authority of traditional social standards.
Does The Pornographers include disability representation?
There are no characters with visible or invisible disabilities in the narrative.
Present on Screen
- Sophisticated subversion of traditional gender hierarchies through women's ability to drive the story.
- Powerful critique of institutionalized morality and rigid social decorum.
- Naturalistic portrayal of characters operating outside conventional social norms.
Limited or Absent
- Lack of explicit representation for LGBTQ+ identities.
- Absence of racial or ethnic diversity within the cast.
Official Synopsis
A former Buddhist monk turned erotic filmmaker, Subuyan lives with hairdresser Haru and her two teenage children. Shooting two skin flicks per day, he somehow manages to stay out of the clutches of the yakuza, but real trouble starts when Haru discovers him lusting after her daughter.
Where to Watch
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select or search, Escape to close.
Similar Movies
Bed and Board
1970
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 3.3 out of 10
Sexual Chronicles of a French Family
2012
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 5.7 out of 10
Lolita
1962
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 1.5 out of 10
Love Exposure
2008
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 8.8 out of 10
Montenegro
1981
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 6.8 out of 10
Sex
1970
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 6.4 out of 10
A Lustful Man
1961
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 4.2 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.