New Showbiz

You are here:
The New Yorker at 100

The New Yorker at 100

2025

Director

Marshall Curry

Runtime

97 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Hard-hitting journalism. Era-defining fiction. Witty cartoons. The New Yorker marks its 100th anniversary with this look at its past, present and future. The New Yorker's centennial reveals behind-the-scenes access to editors, writers, and archives of this culturally vital magazine, one of print's last survivors.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

6.0/10

Good


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

Representation is largely contextual rather than character-driven. The film explores the magazine's historical role in documenting shifting social mores and the evolution of queer discourse in literature.

Gender Representation

Good

The documentary highlights the significant influence of women within the magazine’s editorial and creative history. Figures like Françoise Mouly and Julianne Moore showcase women as central architects of the publication.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The film examines a transition from a historically homogeneous viewpoint to a more intersectional global perspective. It includes diverse voices like Ronan Farrow and Jon Lee Anderson to reflect broader engagement.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The film prioritizes investigative rigor and a sophisticated, intellectualized view of media. It frames the magazine as a survivor of shifting cultural tides and the rise of digital capitalism.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no specific evidence regarding the portrayal of disability or neurodivergence within this documentary.

Strengths

  • Highlights women as central architects of the magazine's intellectual and aesthetic direction.
  • Reflects a transition toward a more intersectional and globalized editorial perspective.
  • Documents the magazine's adaptation to shifting social mores and cultural tides.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks specific character-driven narratives regarding LGBTQ+ identities.
  • Focuses more on institutional evolution than a comprehensive survey of racial diversity.
  • Provides no visible evidence regarding the representation of disability or neurodivergence.

AI Analysis

The documentary serves as a retrospective on a major media institution, tracing its evolution from traditionalist roots toward a more inclusive framework. It succeeds in showing how a legacy publication adapts its lens to reflect a multifaceted social reality. While the film captures the magazine's historical impact, its focus remains primarily on institutional evolution. It highlights the shift from an Anglo-centric dominance toward a more globalized and intersectional editorial approach. Ultimately, the film functions as a study of how a cultural pillar navigates a century of changing social consciousness, moving from a homogeneous past toward a more diverse present.

How are these scores produced? →

Similar Movies

Movie poster for Everybody Street

Everybody Street

2013

No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 6.6 out of 10
Movie poster for The Pulitzer At 100

The Pulitzer At 100

2017

No user ratings available yet
No diversity score available

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.