
Choice of Arms
1981

1955
Not RatedDirector
Jules Dassin
Runtime
118 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Out of prison after a five-year stretch, jewel thief Tony turns down a quick job his friend Jo offers him, until he discovers that his old girlfriend Mado has become the lover of local gangster Pierre Grutter during Tony's absence. Expanding a minor smash-and-grab into a full-scale jewel heist, Tony and his crew appear to get away clean, but their actions after the job is completed threaten the lives of everyone involved.
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film operates within a strictly heteronormative framework. There is no evidence of non-cisnormative gender identities or same-sex intimacy.
Gender Representation
Women occupy peripheral or reactive spaces, serving primarily as catalysts for male conflict. While Mado possesses some emotional agency, her role is defined by romantic associations with men.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The cast is predominantly white, reflecting the demographic focus of the era. The narrative lacks diverse ethnic backgrounds, focusing instead on a localized Parisian criminal subculture.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film disrupts conventional morality through moral relativism. It eschews hero-villain dichotomies, presenting a world governed by professional codes rather than legal or religious imperatives.
Disability Representation
The film does not feature prominent characters with visible or invisible disabilities. The focus remains on the physical prowess of the heist crew.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Rififi is a masterclass in heist mechanics but remains a product of its mid-century noir origins. It prioritizes a professionalized criminal underworld over demographic variety, resulting in a narrative that is almost entirely male-dominated and ethnically homogeneous. While the film lacks representation in terms of gender, race, and sexuality, it finds depth in its cultural subversion. By rejecting traditional moral hierarchies and institutional authority, it offers a sophisticated look at situational ethics and survival-driven social systems. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its thematic complexity rather than its inclusive casting, making it a landmark of genre realism that lacks modern social breadth.

1981

1967

1975

1954

1997

1949

1950

1946
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.