
Faces
1968

1971
RDirector
John Schlesinger
Runtime
110 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Recently divorced career woman Alex Greville begins a romantic relationship with glamorous mod artist Bob Elkin, fully aware that he's also intimately involved with middle-aged doctor Daniel Hirsh. For both Alex and Daniel, the younger man represents a break with their repressive pasts, and though both know that Bob is seeing both of them, neither is willing to let go of the youth and vitality he brings to their otherwise stable lives.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film offers a nuanced look at non-heteronormative dynamics through Bob Elkin's connection to Daniel Hirsh. This relationship is integrated into the central emotional web rather than treated as a subplot. It avoids caricature, focusing on the complexities of queer desire.
Gender Representation
Alex Greville is centered as a character with significant emotional agency and internal conflict. The film avoids idealized domesticity, instead exploring the messy realities of female autonomy and post-divorce identity. It rejects traditional feminine submissiveness.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The narrative is a highly localized study of London’s upper-middle-class social strata. The cast and setting are largely homogeneous, lacking intersectional diversity or intentional use of race to challenge social constraints.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film explores moral relativism by presenting infidelity and deception as manifestations of modern isolation. It deconstructs the sanctity of the traditional family unit, framing long-term romantic institutions as potentially repressive.
Disability Representation
There is no prominent depiction of visible or invisible disabilities that drive the narrative or serve as central character arcs.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Sunday Bloody Sunday serves as a sophisticated deconstruction of traditional romantic and social structures. It prioritizes the subjective, fragmented experiences of its characters over the reinforcement of standard Western social hierarchies. The film succeeds by intentionally subverting heteronormative and moralistic tropes. It moves away from easy moral resolutions, opting instead to explore the complexities of human intimacy and modern isolation. However, the work is limited by its narrow socioeconomic focus. The lack of racial and ethnic breadth keeps the film rooted in a very specific, homogeneous urban milieu.

1968

1989

1978

1965

1988

1960

1986

1971

1958

1945
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.