You are here:

Blue Eyes

Name: Blue Eyes
Director: José Joffily
Released: 2010
Duration: 111 min

Representation Score

8.1/10

Excellent

2010

PG-13

Director

José Joffily

Runtime

111 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Blue Eyes is a character study that deconstructs the morality of a Western authority figure. It succeeds by focusing on the fallout of systemic prejudice and the ability to act of those affected by institutional bias. The film's strength lies in its critique of power dynamics and its shift away from Anglo-centric storytelling. By moving the setting to Brazil, it allows for a more personal, fluid reckoning that challenges established social hierarchies. However, the film's representation of certain groups remains limited. The focus on the protagonist's physical illness and the use of a sex worker as a guide risk falling into traditional clichés without further narrative depth.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Blue Eyes have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film does not include explicit LGBTQ+ characters or non-straight relationships. The plot revolves around the tension between the protagonist and his victims.

How does Blue Eyes portray gender?

Fair

Bia, a young prostitute, plays a crucial role in prompting the protagonist's moral awakening. The film challenges traditional hierarchies by giving this underrepresented woman a leading role over a former authority figure.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Blue Eyes?

Excellent

The story centers on the consequences of prejudice and the death of a Brazilian national. By relocating the setting to Brazil, the film challenges Anglo-centric perspectives and power imbalances.

How does Blue Eyes represent religion and culture?

Good

The story critiques Western institutional authority through the lens of a former immigration officer. It prioritizes a personal journey of atonement over traditional Western legalistic justice.

Does Blue Eyes include disability representation?

Fair

The protagonist's deadly illness drives his quest for redemption in Brazil. However, it is unclear if this physical decline is treated with nuance or used as a metaphor for moral decay.

Present on Screen

Strong critique of systemic prejudice and the power imbalances inherent in immigration and border control.
Effective challenge of traditional hierarchies by giving underrepresented characters a leading role over dominant figures.
A narrative shift that moves away from Anglo-centric perspectives to explore non-Western settings.

Limited or Absent

Lack of explicit representation for LGBTQ+ characters or non-straight storylines.
Potential reliance on clichés regarding the portrayal of sex workers and physical illness as metaphors.
Limited depth in how disability and physical vulnerability are handled beyond driving the plot.

Official Synopsis

Before his compulsory retirement, on his last day of work, Marshall, JFK airport's chief Immigration officer, detains a group of Latin Americans and expose them to a series of humiliating situations. Blinded by prejudice, Marshall ends up by causing the death of a young Brazilian. After a period in prison, Marshall goes to Brazil, deadly ill and in a desperate search in order to purge his guilt. In his quest, he is guided by Bia, a young prostitute.

How are these scores produced? →