
Arabian Nights: Volume 3, The Enchanted One
2015

2015
Director
Miguel Gomes
Runtime
132 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
In which Scheherazade tells of how desolation invaded men : “It hath reached me, O auspicious King, that a Judge will cry instead of giving out her sentence. A runaway murderer will wander through the land for over forty days and will teletransport himself to escape the Guard while dreaming of prostitutes and partridges. A wounded cow will reminisce about a thousand-year-old olive tree while saying what she must say, which will sound none less than sad ! The residents of a tower block in the suburbs will save parrots and piss inside lifts while surrounded by dead people and ghosts; including in fact a dog that…”. And seeing the morning break, Scheherazade fell silent.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film explores identity through theatrical archetypes and performance artifice. It lacks explicit, centralized LGBTQ+ narratives or non-cisnormative character arcs, prioritizing aesthetic experimentation over identity-based storytelling.
Gender Representation
Gender is framed as a performative construct rather than a static hierarchy. The film uses actors to inhabit roles that highlight the fluidity and artificiality of gendered archetypes.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
Documentary-style segments reflect the multicultural fabric of contemporary Portugal. The casting avoids homogeneous Mediterranean depictions, offering a nuanced, pluralistic portrayal of the local landscape.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The narrative deconstructs Western storytelling tropes by favoring moral relativism. It replaces linear, religious morality with a fragmented, episodic structure that prioritizes subjective, postmodern reality.
Disability Representation
There is no significant evidence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities driving the narrative. The focus remains on formal experimentation rather than neurodivergence or physical disability.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Miguel Gomes delivers a work of formal subversion that prioritizes postmodern deconstruction over overt political messaging. The film challenges the stability of the cinematic image by blurring the lines between documentary realism and stylized fiction. While the film succeeds in disrupting traditional narrative authority and monolithic cultural identities, it lacks specific focus on marginalized identities. It functions more as an aesthetic inquiry into truth and performance than a vehicle for explicit representation. Ultimately, the film's diversity is found in its refusal to adhere to singular cultural aesthetics or traditional moralistic progressions.

2015

2015

1991
1996

1981

2014

2014

2018

1984

2010

2019

2009
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.