
Arabian Nights: Volume 2, The Desolate One
2015

2015
Director
Miguel Gomes
Runtime
126 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
In which Scheherazade doubts that she will still be able to tell stories to please the King, given that what she has to tell weighs three thousand tonnes. She therefore escapes from the palace and travels the Kingdom in search of pleasure and enchantment. Her father, the Grand-Vizier, arranges to meet her at the Ferris wheel, and Scheherazade resumes her narration: “Auspicious King, in old shanty towns of Lisbon there was a community of bewitched men who, in all rigour and passion, dedicated themselves to teaching birds to sing…”. And seeing the morning break, Scheherazade fell silent.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film explores identity as a fluid, performative construct rather than a fixed reality. While it lacks explicit depictions of same-sex intimacy, it engages with non-cisnormative ideas of desire.
Gender Representation
Scheherazade is granted significant narrative agency, subverting the trope of the passive female subject. The film moves away from women as objects of a gaze toward women as architects of myth.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
Set largely in contemporary Portugal, the film focuses on local Lisbon communities. It uses fairy tale motifs as metaphors for the 'other' to blur lines between the local and exotic.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The work deconstructs Western narrative traditions by prioritizing subjective truth over authoritative morality. It critiques rigid structures like the Palace in favor of a liberated, secular exploration of experience.
Disability Representation
There is no explicit evidence of characters with disabilities driving the plot. The themes of bewitchment may touch on altered consciousness, but no specific disability narratives are present.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Miguel Gomes delivers a postmodern deconstruction of traditional storytelling, prioritizing the fluidity of identity over didactic representation. The film succeeds in subverting archetypal power dynamics, particularly regarding gendered hierarchies and moral rigidity. While the work excels at challenging Western narrative structures and exploring the performative nature of the self, it lacks high-visibility markers for racial and disability-based diversity. The focus remains largely on stylistic subversion and the exploration of the marginalized through metaphor. Ultimately, the film is a sophisticated study of subjectivity. It trades overt social representation for a deeper interrogation of how identity and truth are constructed within the cinematic frame.

2015

2015

2014

2001

1995

1999
2011

2019

2021

2020

1993

2015
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.