You are here:
La cigarra no es un bicho

La cigarra no es un bicho

1963

Director

Daniel Tinayre

Runtime

101 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

The vicissitudes of six different couples who arrive at a hostel in Buenos Aires called La Cigarra and are quarantined because of a supposed bubonic plague, causing all kinds of inconveniences and entanglements as a result of this forced coexistence.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.9/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film centers on the romantic entanglements of six heterosexual couples. It lacks explicit non-cisnormative identities or narratives designed to critique heteronormativity through a queer lens.

Gender Representation

Good

Women demonstrate significant agency, using intellect and psychological manipulation to navigate power dynamics. Conversely, men are often portrayed in states of vulnerability, chaos, or comedic ineptitude.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The cast reflects the socioeconomic demographics of 1960s Buenos Aires. The narrative focuses on class-based friction rather than prioritizing racial blending or intersectional diversity.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The story offers a secular critique of Western institutions and the capitalist leisure class. It replaces traditional religious or patriotic ideals with situational ethics and moral relativism.

Disability Representation

Fair

The plot does not feature characters with visible or invisible disabilities as central agents. The narrative focuses on psychological pathologies rather than physical or neurodivergent representation.

Strengths

  • Subverts traditional gender hierarchies by portraying men as vulnerable or inept.
  • Provides significant agency to female characters through psychological manipulation.
  • Offers a sophisticated, secular critique of capitalist leisure class structures.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks explicit representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative narratives.
  • Does not include characters with visible or invisible disabilities as central agents.
  • Maintains a narrow demographic focus centered on 1960s Buenos Aires social classes.

AI Analysis

The film functions as a cynical microcosm of social breakdown, using a quarantine setting to strip away the veneer of upper-class stability. While it adheres to the demographic norms of its era, it subverts them through character dynamics. Its primary strength lies in its gender subversion and its critique of traditional morality. By undermining masculine authority and empowering female intellect, the film challenges the standard social hierarchies of the 1960s. However, the film remains limited by its lack of queer representation and its narrow focus on a localized, class-based ensemble. It prioritizes psychological tension over broader intersectional or physical diversity.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.