
Una famiglia perfetta
2012

2015
Director
Sergio Rubini
Runtime
101 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Vanni and Linda live in a penthouse apartment for rent in the center of Rome. Vanni writes novels, Linda 'cooperates' to his novels. Between a vernissage and an exhibition of Basquiat, thay hang out Alfredo and Constanza, a couple on the verge of a nervous breakdown. Alfredo is a surgeon with the habit of waking up early and has a lover, Constanza is a dermatologist with the same habits. With the intent to vent their frustrations in their friends' living room, Alfredo and Constanza take hostage the couple and recriminate loudly about the past and the present. In an impossible attempt to contain them, Vanni and Linda eventually take the field and also thrash each other. Someone will end up getting hurt by the end of the night.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film centers on the dissolution of heteronormative domestic structures. It explores infidelity and romantic dissatisfaction but lacks explicit engagement with queer identities or non-cisnormative narratives.
Gender Representation
Female characters like Linda and Constanza possess significant verbal agency. They are depicted as intellectual contributors to the conflict rather than submissive or passive domestic partners.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The setting is a localized study of the Italian bourgeoisie in Rome. The cast reflects a homogeneous demographic consistent with this specific socioeconomic class.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The narrative critiques the stability of the nuclear family and traditional moral standards. It prioritizes subjective emotional truths over institutional or established social decorum.
Disability Representation
Psychological distress and nervous breakdowns drive the plot conflict. However, these elements are not used to provide nuanced explorations of neurodivergence or disability.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Sergio Rubini’s film functions as a psychological chamber piece that deconstructs the facades of middle-class life. It finds its strength in challenging the idealized version of social and familial stability through intense interpersonal friction. However, the film lacks demographic breadth. The narrative is confined to a homogeneous socioeconomic milieu, offering little representation of diverse racial, ethnic, or LGBTQ+ identities. Ultimately, the work prioritizes character-driven psychological tension over intersectional visibility, making it a study of class-specific volatility rather than broad social diversity.

2012

2018

1990

2015

2011

2014

1959

1965

2003

2012

2014

2010
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.