New Showbiz

You are here:
A

A

1998

Director

Tatsuya Mori

Runtime

136 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Roughly chronological, from 3/96 to 11/96, with a coda in spring of 1997: inside compounds of Aum Shinrikyo, a Buddhist sect led by Shoko Asahara. (Members confessed to a murderous sarin attack in the Tokyo subway in 1995.) We see what they eat, where they sleep, and how they respond to media scrutiny, on-going trials, the shrinking of their fortunes, and the criticism of society. Central focus is placed on Hiroshi Araki, a young man who finds himself elevated to chief spokesman for Aum after its leaders are arrested. Araki faces extreme hostility from the Japanese public, who find it hard to believe that most followers of the cult had no idea of the attacks and even harder to understand why these followers remain devoted to the religion, if not the violence.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

5.5/10

Fair

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film lacks explicit evidence of LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. The focus remains strictly on the sociological and psychological dynamics of the Aum Shinrikyo sect.

Gender Representation

Fair

Narrative agency is skewed toward male figures, specifically Hiroshi Araki and the sect's male leadership. While women are present, their roles are not explicitly detailed.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The subjects are ethnically homogeneous, reflecting a localized study of a Japanese religious movement. It functions as an ethnographic record of a specific national demographic.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The documentary disrupts conventional morality by centering the perspective of cult followers. It explores the tension between individual devotion and the hostility of state institutions.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no documented evidence regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities within the film's context.

Strengths

  • Challenges mainstream moral narratives by providing a platform for marginalized, misunderstood groups.
  • Offers a complex, non-binary examination of social isolation and individual devotion.
  • Provides a nuanced, observational look at the internal logic of a specific social phenomenon.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative narratives.
  • Displays a gender imbalance, with visible agency skewed heavily toward male figures.
  • Maintains an ethnically homogeneous cast due to its specific localized focus.

AI Analysis

Tatsuya Mori’s documentary serves as a sociological deconstruction rather than a vehicle for identity-based representation. It avoids a binary 'good vs. evil' framework, opting instead to examine how individuals navigate extreme social ostracization. The film's strength lies in its refusal to adhere to mainstream moral clarity. By providing a platform for those on the fringes of society, it challenges the hegemony of social judgment and explores the internal logic of a misunderstood group. However, the film is limited by its narrow ethnographic scope. The homogeneity of the subjects and the heavy focus on male leadership result in low scores for racial and gender diversity.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.