You are here:

A

Name: A
Director: Tatsuya Mori
Released: 1998
Duration: 136 min

Representation Score

4.4/10

Fair

1998

Director

Tatsuya Mori

Runtime

136 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Tatsuya Mori’s documentary serves as a sociological deconstruction rather than a vehicle for identity-based representation. It avoids a binary 'good vs. evil' framework, opting instead to explore how individuals navigate extreme social ostracization. The film's strength lies in its refusal to adhere to mainstream moral clarity. By providing a platform for those on the fringes of society, it challenges the dominance of social judgment and examines the internal logic of a misunderstood group. However, the film is limited by its narrow ethnographic scope. The homogeneity of the subjects and the heavy focus on male leadership result in low scores for racial and gender diversity.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does A have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film does not include any explicit LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. It focuses on the sociological and psychological dynamics of the Aum Shinrikyo sect.

How does A portray gender?

Fair

The narrative primarily centers around male figures such as Hiroshi Araki and the sect's male leadership. Women are present but their roles are not extensively detailed.

How racially and ethnically diverse is A?

Fair

The subjects are ethnically uniform, reflecting a study of a Japanese religious movement. It functions as an ethnographic record of a specific national demographic.

How does A represent religion and culture?

Good

The documentary shifts away from conventional morality by focusing on the perspective of cult followers. It delves into the tension between individual devotion and the state's hostile stance.

Does A include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no documented evidence of the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities within the film's context.

Present on Screen

Challenges mainstream moral narratives by providing a platform for underrepresented, misunderstood groups.
Offers a complex, non-binary examination of social isolation and individual devotion.
Provides a nuanced, observational look at the internal logic of a specific social phenomenon.

Limited or Absent

Lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-assuming gender matches what was assigned at birth narratives.
Displays a gender imbalance, with visible ability to act skewed heavily toward male figures.
Maintains an ethnically homogeneous cast due to its specific localized focus.

Official Synopsis

Roughly chronological, from 3/96 to 11/96, with a coda in spring of 1997: inside compounds of Aum Shinrikyo, a Buddhist sect led by Shoko Asahara. (Members confessed to a murderous sarin attack in the Tokyo subway in 1995.) We see what they eat, where they sleep, and how they respond to media scrutiny, on-going trials, the shrinking of their fortunes, and the criticism of society. Central focus is placed on Hiroshi Araki, a young man who finds himself elevated to chief spokesman for Aum after its leaders are arrested. Araki faces extreme hostility from the Japanese public, who find it hard to believe that most followers of the cult had no idea of the attacks and even harder to understand why these followers remain devoted to the religion, if not the violence.

How are these scores produced? →