You are here:

The Running Jumping & Standing Still Film

The Running Jumping & Standing Still Film

Representation Score

3.0/10

Limited

1959

Director

Richard Lester

Runtime

11 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Richard Lester’s experimental short serves primarily as a formalist exercise in avant-garde comedy. Due to its disjointed structure, the film lacks the necessary elements to develop complex, multi-layered characters. The low diversity score results from this structural void rather than active prejudice. While the film disrupts traditional cinematic expectations, it fails to leverage this subversion to advance specific progressive social frameworks or character-driven roles.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does The Running Jumping & Standing Still Film have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film lacks any clear evidence of LGBTQ+ identities or non-assuming gender matches what was assigned at birth characters due to its disjointed structure. Consequently, there are no meaningful relationship arcs involving LGBTQ+ individuals.

How does The Running Jumping & Standing Still Film portray gender?

Fair

It is unclear whether the absurdist comedy subverts gender hierarchies or adheres to mid-century norms. The absence of sustained character arcs makes it difficult to assess the role of female characters.

How racially and ethnically diverse is The Running Jumping & Standing Still Film?

Limited

The film appears to follow the homogeneous casting practices typical of 1959. There is no indication of a non-white majority cast or intentional racial diversity.

How does The Running Jumping & Standing Still Film represent religion and culture?

Fair

The experimental structure challenges traditional Western narrative conventions. However, the film does not explicitly address anti-religious or anti-capitalist themes.

Does The Running Jumping & Standing Still Film include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no documented evidence of the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities in this experimental short.

Present on Screen

  • The film's rejection of traditional narrative structures challenges conventional Western storytelling methods.

Limited or Absent

  • The lack of narrative continuity prevents the development of meaningful, diverse characterizations.
  • The film lacks evidence of intentional racial diversity or non-white representation.
  • There is no discernible representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-assuming gender matches what was assigned at birth characters.

Official Synopsis

A short film without any direct action designed more as an experiment, with disjointed comic scenes with no common thread.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.