You are here:

The Killing Fields

Name: The Killing Fields
Director: Roland Joffé
Released: 1984
Duration: 142 min

Representation Score

5.2/10

Fair

1984

Director

Roland Joffé

Runtime

142 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

The Killing Fields is a complex work that balances traditional cinematic structures with progressive thematic depth. It succeeds by refusing to center Western exceptionalism, instead highlighting the ability to act of non-Western individuals during a global collapse. While the film lacks representation in LGBTQ+ and gender-parity categories, it achieves high marks for its post-colonial critique. The narrative effectively uses a specific historical tragedy to challenge the perceived stability of Western institutions. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its ability to move away from an Anglo-centric viewpoint, focusing instead on the profound human cost of the Khmer Rouge's radical ideology.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does The Killing Fields have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film adheres to a traditional framework that assumes everyone is straight or cisgender. There are no visible depictions of LGBTQ+ identities or queer narratives.

How does The Killing Fields portray gender?

Limited

The perspective focuses on male-driven action and professional journalism. Women are often shown as victims of systemic issues rather than active plot drivers.

How racially and ethnically diverse is The Killing Fields?

Excellent

The film excels by centering Dith Pran, a non-Western protagonist. It disrupts the 'Western savior' cliché by highlighting the interdependence between the American reporter and his Cambodian interpreter.

How does The Killing Fields represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The narrative provides a profound critique of Western interventionism. It portrays the destruction of Buddhism and the forced dissolution of the family unit as systemic atrocities.

Does The Killing Fields include disability representation?

Fair

The film documents widespread physical and psychological trauma from war. However, these portrayals serve the broader historical tragedy rather than providing individualized ability to act to characters.

Present on Screen

Centers a non-Western protagonist, providing authentic representation of the Cambodian experience.
Disrupts the 'Western savior' cliché through the interdependence of the leads.
Offers a profound critique of Western interventionism and failed political structures.
Engages deeply with post-colonial themes and the destruction of traditional religious institutions.

Limited or Absent

Lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-assuming gender matches what was assigned at birth narratives.
Gender representation is limited, focusing primarily on male-driven action and professional roles.
Women are often relegated to the role of victims rather than active agents.
Disability is treated as a systemic byproduct of war rather than through individualized character's ability to drive the story.

Official Synopsis

New York Times reporter Sydney Schanberg is on assignment covering the Cambodian Civil War, with the help of local interpreter Dith Pran and American photojournalist Al Rockoff. When the U.S. Army pulls out amid escalating violence, Schanberg makes exit arrangements for Pran and his family. Pran, however, tells Schanberg he intends to stay in Cambodia to help cover the unfolding story — a decision he may regret as the Khmer Rouge rebels move in.

How are these scores produced? →